taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913507/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913507	FIGURE 3. Dorsal and ventral images of the female holotype (MVZ 269485) of Eurycea subfluvicola. Preserved October 2013.	FIGURE 3. Dorsal and ventral images of the female holotype (MVZ 269485) of Eurycea subfluvicola. Preserved October 2013.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913509/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913509	FIGURE 4. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) of adult E. subfluvicola (dark grey) and larval E. multiplicata (light grey), demonstrating minimal overlap in head (top) and body (bottom) morphospace. Landmarks and semilandmarks are shown in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) of adult E. subfluvicola (dark grey) and larval E. multiplicata (light grey), demonstrating minimal overlap in head (top) and body (bottom) morphospace. Landmarks and semilandmarks are shown in Figure 2.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913511/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913511	FIGURE 5. Side by side lateral and dorsal images of adult E. subfluvicola (top) and larval E. multiplicata (bottom) illustrating head shape differences between syntopic species.	FIGURE 5. Side by side lateral and dorsal images of adult E. subfluvicola (top) and larval E. multiplicata (bottom) illustrating head shape differences between syntopic species.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913513/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913513	FIGURE 6. Cleared and stained images of E. subfluvicola (top) and E. multiplicata (bottom) skulls. Yellow arrows indicate quadrate and squamosal bones which are collectively more robust in E. subfluvicola than E. multiplicata. Red arrows point to trunk vertebrae which appear more elongate in E. subfluvicola than E. multiplicata.	FIGURE 6. Cleared and stained images of E. subfluvicola (top) and E. multiplicata (bottom) skulls. Yellow arrows indicate quadrate and squamosal bones which are collectively more robust in E. subfluvicola than E. multiplicata. Red arrows point to trunk vertebrae which appear more elongate in E. subfluvicola than E. multiplicata.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913517/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913517	FIGURE 7. The 50% majority rule phylogram from a Baysian inference analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Partitioned Bayesian analyses of Cytb (a) and Rag1 (b), based on 15 million generations, showing E. subfluvicola (bold) and its sister taxon E. multiplicata. Posterior probabilities indicating node support are shown for major nodes of ingroup clades. For ingroup taxa, the label is the field number followed by the locality number (1 through 30; Figure 1; Table 1). Note that locality number 5 includes E. subfluvicola and sympatric E. multiplicata. E=Eurycea and P=Pseudotriton.	FIGURE 7. The 50% majority rule phylogram from a Baysian inference analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Partitioned Bayesian analyses of Cytb (a) and Rag1 (b), based on 15 million generations, showing E. subfluvicola (bold) and its sister taxon E. multiplicata. Posterior probabilities indicating node support are shown for major nodes of ingroup clades. For ingroup taxa, the label is the field number followed by the locality number (1 through 30; Figure 1; Table 1). Note that locality number 5 includes E. subfluvicola and sympatric E. multiplicata. E=Eurycea and P=Pseudotriton.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913519/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913519	FIGURE 8. Bayesian species tree chronogram of spelerpines plethodontid salamanders including E. subfluvicola (bold). The species tree and divergence times estimates from *BEAST are based on mitochondrial (Cytb and Nd4) and nuclear gene (Rag1) trees (see Methods). Numbers subtending each node are posterior probabilities of node support for major lineages. Node bars indicate 95% highest posterior density on divergence dates. Some redundant taxa were pruned. E=Eurycea, G=Gyrinophilus, P=Pseudotriton, S=Stereochilus, and U=Urspelerpes. AR=Arkansas, NC=North Carolina, OK=Oklahoma, and TX=Texas.	FIGURE 8. Bayesian species tree chronogram of spelerpines plethodontid salamanders including E. subfluvicola (bold). The species tree and divergence times estimates from *BEAST are based on mitochondrial (Cytb and Nd4) and nuclear gene (Rag1) trees (see Methods). Numbers subtending each node are posterior probabilities of node support for major lineages. Node bars indicate 95% highest posterior density on divergence dates. Some redundant taxa were pruned. E=Eurycea, G=Gyrinophilus, P=Pseudotriton, S=Stereochilus, and U=Urspelerpes. AR=Arkansas, NC=North Carolina, OK=Oklahoma, and TX=Texas.	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
570F1264FFB0FFC0FF2FFF46FED42E28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4913523/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4913523	FIGURE 9. Images of reproductive status in E. subfluvicola. (a) Female with developing ova in ovaries. (b) Male with enlarged testicular lobes, and smaller lobules in development. (c) Developing embryo of E. subfluvicola (16 days old).	FIGURE 9. Images of reproductive status in E. subfluvicola. (a) Female with developing ova in ovaries. (b) Male with enlarged testicular lobes, and smaller lobules in development. (c) Developing embryo of E. subfluvicola (16 days old).	2014-04-11	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.		Zenodo	biologists	Steffen, Michael A.;Irwin, Kelly J.;Blair, Andrea L.;Bonett, Ronald M.			
