taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03B787A54871FC4DA5A7007D8EADD474.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504882/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504882	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54871FC4DA5A7007D8EADD474.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504884/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504884	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54871FC4DA5A7007D8EADD474.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504886/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504886	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54871FC4AA6AE02AE8EE2D377.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504882/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504882	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54871FC4AA6AE02AE8EE2D377.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504884/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504884	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54871FC4AA6AE02AE8EE2D377.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504886/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504886	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA69507138FA6D76B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504882/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504882	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA69507138FA6D76B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504884/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504884	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA69507138FA6D76B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504886/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504886	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA6F804718C55D657.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504882/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504882	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 1. Habitus views of Archedinus spp. A–B – A. antoshkai sp. nov., C – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello, 2007. A, C – dorsal habitus. B – lateral habitus. Image 1C by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA6F804718C55D657.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504884/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504884	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 2. Details of Archedinus spp. A, C, E – A. antoshkai sp. nov. B, D, F – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007. A‒B – head dorsal view. C‒D – head antero-lateral view. E‒F – pronotum dorsal view. Images 2B,D,F courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA6F804718C55D657.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504886/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504886	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	Fig. 3. Details of Archedinus spp. A, B, D, F – A. antoshkai sp. nov. C, E, G – A. howdeni Morón & Vaz-de-Mello 2007.A, C – aedeagus dorsal view. B – aedeagus lateral view. D–E – outline of mentum. F–G – antennae with arrow indicating third antennomere. Images 3C,G by courtesy of François Génier.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA69A051D8960D189.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA5CA035689AAD230.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504892/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504892	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4EA50301398960D75A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54875FC4FA5EB04228C98D23D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504892/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504892	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54874FC4FA74901C48F8DD647.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54874FC40A5DB07BB8F71D947.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504892/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504892	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54879FC43A6B003DD8FC4D017.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A54878FC43A6B500A78820D24E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A5487EFC45A6A901998DE8D43A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504892/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504892	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	Fig 6. Generalized distribution map of Coelocratus Burmeister, 1842 (star), Golinca Thomson, 1878 (stripes), Inca LePeletier & Serville, 1828 (gray) and Pantodinus Burmeister, 1847 (black) in Central and South America.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
03B787A5487EFC45A751073C893CD474.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4504890/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4504890	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	Fig 5. Habitus views of Incini species.A–C, E, G–H, J–K, M – dorsal habitus. D, F, I, L – lateral habitus. A–B – Archedinus relictus Morón & Krikken, 1990: A –♁ paratype; B –♀ paratype. C–D – Coelocratus rufipennis (Gory & Percheron, 1833), ♁ lectotype. E‒F – Inca clathratus clathratus (Olivier, 1792), ♁. G – I. clathratus sommeri Westwood, 1844, ♀. H–J – Golinca bifrons (Olivier, 1789): H–I – ♁, J –♀. K–M – Pantodinus klugi Burmeister, 1847: K–L –♁, M –♀. All scale bars = 10 mm. Images 5A–B courtesy of D. Kovac, C–D by courtesy of G. Cuccodoro, 5E‒M: by courtesy of R. Limoges.	2018-09-10	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael		Zenodo	biologists	Seidel, Matthias;Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel;Sousa, Rafael			
