identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03860F09FF8DFFEFFF68D0D1DD3FFD6C.text	03860F09FF8DFFEFFF68D0D1DD3FFD6C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Parmulopsyllus Borges & Farias & Mácola & Neves & Son 2021	<div><p>Parmulopsyllus gen. nov.</p> <p>Diagnosis</p> <p>Body shield with only pedigerous somite 2 free. Urosome cylindrical and 3-segmented.Antennule of female 16-segmented with aesthetasc on 15th segment. Antenna with 1-segmented exopod and 3-segmented endopod. Oral cone elongated. Mandible consisting of stylet and 1-segmented palp bearing two distal setae. Maxilla without ornamentations. Maxillule bilobed. Maxilliped 4-segmented. Legs 1-3 biramous, both rami 3-segmented. Third endopodal segment of leg 2 with armature formula 1,2,2; third exopodal and endopodal segments of leg 3 with armature formula III,1+I,3 and 1,2,3 respectively. Leg 4 totally absent. Free segment of leg 5 with 3 setae.</p> <p>Remarks: Parmulopsyllus gen. nov. shows the characteristics of the subfamily Parmulodinae.A single thoracic free somite between cephalothorax and abdominal pleural plate. Mandible not greatly lengthened and retaining a recognizable blade. Basal segment of maxillule small, with long inner lobe, and outer lobe about 1/3 total length of the inner one. Leg 4 absent; leg 5 present as in Entomolepinae, but considerably shorter (McKinnon 1988), or totally absent as Paralepeopsyllus Ummerkutty, 1961.</p> <p>Considering the swimming legs of the genera included in Parmulodinae, Parmulella has leg 4 similar to a knob or a monomerous rudiment and its leg 5 is leafshaped or clavate (Stock 1992). In Parmulodes, leg 4 is reduced to a minute distal seta and leg 5 is 1-segmented and slightly elongated (Wilson 1944, Canário et al. 2019). Parmulopsyllus gen. nov. has leg 4 totally absent and leg 5 slightly longer than in Parmulodes but not as long as in Parmulella.</p> <p>Parmulopsyllus gen. nov. also differs from the other genera in its subfamily by having a 16-segmented antennule instead of a 17 or a 18-segmented antennule as in Parmulodes and Parmulella, respectively (Stock 1992, Wilson 1944); a 4-segmented maxilliped instead of a 5-segmented as both other genera, and a distinctive armature formulae on the third endopodal segment of leg 2 with formula 1,2,2 instead of 1,2,3 as Parmulodes and Parmulella (Stock 1992, Wilson 1944, Canário et al. 2019), on the third endopodal segment of leg 3 with formula 1,2,3 instead of 1,1,3 as in both other genera (Stock 1992, Canário et al. 2019).</p> <p>Etymology: ‘ Parmula ’ from the Latin little shield, added suffix ‘odes’ (masculine) and ‘psyllus’ from the greek meaning flea. Gender masculine.</p> <p>Type species by original designation: Parmulopsyllus iamarinoi sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03860F09FF8DFFEFFF68D0D1DD3FFD6C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Borges, Camila;Farias, Amilcar;Mácola, Rosa;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Son, Rodrigo Johns-	Borges, Camila, Farias, Amilcar, Mácola, Rosa, Neves, Elizabeth G., Son, Rodrigo Johns- (2021): A new Entomolepididae genus and a new species of Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) and their association with Aplysina Nardo, 1834 (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4981 (2): 301-316, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4981.2.5
03860F09FF8EFFEBFF68D67ED83FFCED.text	03860F09FF8EFFEBFF68D67ED83FFCED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Parmulopsyllus iamarinoi Borges & Farias & Mácola & Neves & Son 2021	<div><p>Parmulopsyllus iamarinoi sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 1–3)</p> <p>lsid:zoobank.org:act: 408AB588-31F7-4F95-A3A0-E58F1ABB140E</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype female (UFBA 3290) associated with Aplysina cauliformis at 3 m depth in Yacht Club Beach, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, collected by C. Borges in 27 th September 2012.</p> <p>Description of female.</p> <p>Body shield flattened (Fig. 1a), with radiating bands along outer margin. Mean body length (excluding caudal setae) 1110 µm and mean body width 930 µm. Pedigerous somite 1 fused with cephalosome. Pedigerous somite 2 narrower than the others. Pedigerous 3 and 4 fused, forming posterior shield covering urosome almost entirely, except for distal portion of anal somite and caudal rami. Urosome (Fig. 1b) 3-segmented. Genital double-somite fused with fifth pedigerous somite, 257 × 150 µm; length: width ratio 1.7:1. Both postgenital somites wider than long, 62 × 85, 65 × 80 µm, respectively. Caudal rami elongated, 27 µm long, armed with 6 plumose setae distally.</p> <p>Antennule (Fig. 1c) slender, 325 µm long (not including setae), and 16-segmented. Length of segments in proximal to distal order: 111, 14, 9, 48, 15, 16, 5, 16, 18, 21, 23, 22, 25, 26, 28, and 29 µm, respectively. Segmental homologies and setation as follows: 1(I)–1; 2(II)–2; 3(III)–1; 4(IV-VII)–7; 5(VIII)–2; 6(IX–XII)–5; 7(XIII)–1; 8(XIV)– I+1; 9(XV)–2; 10(XVI)–2; 11(XVII)–1; 12(XVIII)–1; 13(XIX)–2; 14(XX)–1; 15(XXI)– 1+ae; 16(XXII– XXVIII)–9. Aesthetasc 94 µm long. Segment 8 bearing spine and seta. Antenna (Fig. 1d) 348 µm long (including distal claw); unarmed coxa with 53 µm long, basis 108 µm long. Exopod 1-segmented, 37 µm long armed with two very short, distal setae. Endopod 3-segmented; first segment unarmed, 91 µm long, ornamented with setules along outer margin, second segment 23 µm long and unarmed, third segment 24 µm long and armed with plumose, robust seta and terminal claw slightly curved with 36 µm long.</p> <p>Oral cone (Fig. 2a) 264 µm long, reaching genital double somite, distal margin (Fig. 2b) ornamented with a dense bunch of setules on spatula-like tip. Mandible (Fig. 2c) comprising stylet and slender 1-segmented palp measuring 127 µm long, with 2 distal unequal setae, one partially plumose. Stylet slender (Fig. 2c) with 350 µm, with middle portion narrowing abruptly. Maxillule (Fig. 2d) bilobed. Inner lobe 98 µm long, armed with four naked setae, one much shorter than others. Outer lobe 30 µm long, armed with four distal setae. Maxilla (Fig. 2e) with syncoxa measuring 214 µm long and claw 156 µm long, very curved distally. Maxilliped (Fig. 2f) 4-segmented, 419 µm long (excluding claw); syncoxa and basis 113 and 167 µm long respectively, both unarmed. Endopod 2-segmented; first segment 46 µm long and armed with two setae; second segment 31 µm long, ornamented with setules on inner margin and armed with seta close to distal claw. Claw ornamented with setules and bearing slight indentation near tip.</p> <p>Legs 1 to 3 (Figs. 3a–c) biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 absent.</p> <p>NEW NEW Armature formula of legs 1 to 3 as follows, with missing seta indicated in parenthesis:</p> <p>All exopodal segments of legs 1 to 3 (Figs. 3a, b and c) have spinules on outer margins.All endopodal segments of leg 1 have row of long setules on outer margin, similarly for first and third endopodal segments of leg 2. On leg 1, first exopodal segment with distal denticle and second endopodal segment showing four denticles. Leg 3 with first and second endopodal segments bearing four and three deticle, respectively. First endopodal segment of leg 2 showing row of spinules distally.</p> <p>Free exopodal segment of P5 (Fig. 1b) elongated and curved, 207 µm long, reaching distal margin of genital double-somite, and armed with two distal setae and another one subdistally.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Etymology. Species named in honor of Atila Iamarino, biologist, PhD in microbiology and scientific communicator for his notorious work informing, educating and raising awareness in combating misinformation about covid-19.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03860F09FF8EFFEBFF68D67ED83FFCED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Borges, Camila;Farias, Amilcar;Mácola, Rosa;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Son, Rodrigo Johns-	Borges, Camila, Farias, Amilcar, Mácola, Rosa, Neves, Elizabeth G., Son, Rodrigo Johns- (2021): A new Entomolepididae genus and a new species of Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) and their association with Aplysina Nardo, 1834 (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4981 (2): 301-316, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4981.2.5
03860F09FF8AFFE6FF68D611DACEFD77.text	03860F09FF8AFFE6FF68D611DACEFD77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Spongiopsyllus intermedius Borges & Farias & Mácola & Neves & Son 2021	<div><p>Spongiopsyllus intermedius sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 4–6)</p> <p>lsid:zoobank.org:act: 5B344D20-F69F-4202-96B1-45B275CF5379</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype female (UFBA 3185) and paratype female (UFBA 3186) associated with Aplysina solangeae, at 3 m depth at Porto da Barra Beach, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, collected by C. Borges, R. Johnsson and E. G. Neves in 9th October, 2014.</p> <p>Description of female.</p> <p>Mean body length (excluding caudal setae) 1065 µm and mean body width 775 µm. Body shield flattened (Fig. 4a), with radiating bands along outer margin. Pedigerous somites 2–4 free. Urosome (Fig. 4b) four-segmented. Genital double-somite fused with fifth pedigerous somite, 237 × 147 µm; length: width ratio 1.6:1. Genital openings near insertion of leg 5. All three postgenital somites wider than long, 52 × 65, 23 × 58 and 42 × 54 µm, respectively. Length prosome: urosome ratio = 1.4:1. Caudal rami elongate, 115 µm long, armed with 6 plumose setae distally.</p> <p>Antennule (Fig. 4c) slender, 257 µm long (not including setae), and 16-segmented. Length of segments: 58, 23, 27, 8, 11, 15, 12, 10, 10, 12, 10, 10, 12, 12, 10 and 17 µm, respectively. Segmental homologies and setation as follows: 1(I)–2; 2(II– III)–2; 3(IV–VI)–6; 4(VII)–2; 5(VIII)–2; 6(IX–XIII)–5; 7(XIV)–2; 8(XV)–2; 9(XVI)–2; 10(XVII)–2; 11(XVIII)–2; 12(XIX)–2; 13(XX)–2; 14(XXI)–2+ae; 15(XXII)–2; 16(XXIII–XXVIII)–6. Aesthetasc 107 µm long.Antenna (Fig. 4d) 187 µm long (including distal claw); basis 67 µm long. Exopod 1-segmented, 48 µm long, and with two unequal, sub-distal setae and five small setules along lateral margin. Endopod 2-segmented; first segment 52 µm long, with six setules on inner margin; second segment 20 µm long, ornamented with row of long setules along outer margin, and armed with 2 naked setae and terminal narrow claw, slightly curved distally.</p> <p>Oral cone 956 µm long, reaching anal somite. Mandible (Fig. 5a) comprising stylet and slender 2-segmented palp measuring 48 and 57 µm long, respectively. Stylet slender, tapering distally. Palp with second segment ornamented with setules along outer margin and armed with two apical, unequal setae.</p> <p>Maxillule (Fig. 5b) bilobed. Inner lobe 67 µm long, armed with two long apical setae. Outer lobe 46 µm long, ornamented with setules along outer margin and armed with three apical setae. Maxilla (Fig. 5c) with syncoxa measuring 174 µm long and curved claw with 137 µm long, armed with minute setule on mid-inner margin.Maxilliped (Fig. 5d) 5-segmented, 287 µm long (excluding claw); syncoxa and basis 94 and 110 µm long, respectively, both unarmed. Endopod 3-segmented, 34, 22, 27 µm long, respectively, and bearing single seta on each segment plus curved claw measuring 46 µm long. All setae naked.</p> <p>NEW NEW Legs 1 to 3 (Figs. 6a–c) biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 (Fig. 6d) with exopod 3-segmented and endopod absent. Armature formula of legs 1 to 4 as follows:</p> <p>Basis of leg 1 with tooth-like projection on outer margin close to outer seta. Second and third endopodal segments of leg 1 (Fig. 6a) prolonged distally into sharp tooth-like process, therefore distal setae of third segment located sub-distally on inner margin. Exopodal spines of leg 1 stout proximally. Second and third endopodal segments of legs 2 and 3 (Figs. 6 b-c) showing similar prolonged process but reduced in size in comparison with leg 1 and not occupying distal position as in third segment of leg 1. Leg 3 with first endopodal segment with outer margin humpshaped middistally; first and second exopodal segments showing small tooth-like projections close to elements. Basis of leg 4 with projection on outer lateral margin.</p> <p>Free exopodal segment of leg 5 (Fig. 4b) elongated, medially curved, 170 µm long, reaching beyond distal margin of genital double-somite, and armed with 3 plumose setae, 2 distal ones and single seta medially on outer margin.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name ‘ intermedius’ means intermediate in Latin, referring to the existence of 16 segments of antennule in the new species. This number of segments is intermediary when compared with the 17-segmented S. adventicius Johnsson, 2000 and the 15-segmented S. redactus Canário et al. 2012.</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>Spongiopsyllus intermedius sp. nov. has all the characters of the genus Spongiopsyllus such as a body shield covering the urosome, except for the tip of the caudal rami, three postgenital somites, and reduction in the female leg setation (Johnsson 2000).</p> <p>The new species has a 16-segmented antennule, differing from S. adventicius, S. redactus and S. atypicus which have 17, 15 and 14 segments, respectively (Canário et al. 2012, 2019, Johnsson 2000). Consequently, the segmental homologies are different in the three species:</p> <p>Spongiopsyllus intermedius sp. nov. has the ancestral segments XXII free and, XXIII-XXVIII fused, S. redactus has XXII-XXVIII fused, S. atypicus has XXII-XXIII and XXIV-XXVIII fused, and S. adventicius has XXII and XXIII free, XXIV-XXVIII fused. Also, the new species shows the homologies of the basal segments of the antennule as II-III, IV-VI, VII, IX-XIII as in S. redactus, which is different from S. adventicius that has II, III-V, VI, VII- VIII, IX-XII and S. atypicus that has II, III-VIII, IX-XIII. (Canário et al. 2012, 2019, Johnsson 2000). Antennule segmentation patterns are built based on model proposed by Huys &amp; Boxshall (1994). The number of setae and key segments such as the one with the aesthetasc provide the cues to trace the homologies and becomes strong characters used in diagnosis of genera and families, not only in Entomolepididae (Kim 2004, McKinnon 1988) but also in other families such as Asterocheridae (Conradi &amp; Bandera 2011, Kim 2013) and Artotrogidae (Eiselt 1965, Kim 2016).</p> <p>S. intermedius sp. nov. has the endopod of the antenna 2-segmented, as in S. redactus and S. atypicus however differing from S. adventicius, that is 3-segmented (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000). Nevertheless, in the new species the distal endopodal segment shows 2 setae and row of setules along the outer margin while S. adventicius and S. redactus have 3 setae and a naked outer margin, and S atypicus has 4 setae and a margin ornamented with long setules (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000). The exopod of the antenna has 2 unequal apical setae in S. intermedius sp. nov. as in S. redactus, unlike S. adventicius that has 2 equal apical setae and S. atypicus that has a smooth distal seta and seven setules laterally (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000).</p> <p>The stylet in the new species tapers distally, similarly to S. adventicius but different from S. redactus that has subapical denticulated margin (Canário et al. 2012, Johnsson 2000). The inner lobe of the maxillule of S. intermeNEW dius sp. nov. is armed with 2 setae, instead of 3 as in S. adventicius and S. redactus, and 4 in S. atypicus (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000). The new species has the endopod of the maxilliped with armature formula 1,1,1, different from S. adventicius, S. atypicus and S. redactus that have 0,2,1; 2,0,1; and 2,1,1, respectively (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000).</p> <p>Spongiopsyllus intermedius sp. nov. also shows differences in the armature formula of the swimming legs. Coxa of leg 1 has no seta as in S. atypicus and unlike its other congeners that have an inner seta (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000). Basis of legs 3 and 4 with 1-0, while its congeners have no seta, except S. atypicus that has 1-0 on the basis of leg 4 (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000). Third endopodal segment of leg 1 with 6 setae altogether as in S. redactus, unlike S. adventicius and S. atypicus that has 5 setae (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000).</p> <p>The maxilla is armed with a small setule on inner margin of the claw, the third endopodal segment of leg 2 with seta and spine distally (1, 1+I, 2), the third exopodal segment of leg 3 with distal seta medially (III, 1, 4), and the small tooth-like projections close to the spines of the first and second exopodal segments of P3 are all characters not observed in any of its congeners (Canário et al. 2012, 2019; Johnsson 2000).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03860F09FF8AFFE6FF68D611DACEFD77	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Borges, Camila;Farias, Amilcar;Mácola, Rosa;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Son, Rodrigo Johns-	Borges, Camila, Farias, Amilcar, Mácola, Rosa, Neves, Elizabeth G., Son, Rodrigo Johns- (2021): A new Entomolepididae genus and a new species of Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) and their association with Aplysina Nardo, 1834 (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4981 (2): 301-316, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4981.2.5
03860F09FF80FFE0FF68D1F0DCA1FE20.text	03860F09FF80FFE0FF68D1F0DCA1FE20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Entomolepididae , Brady 1899	<div><p>Key to the species of the Entomolepididae (adapted from Farias et al. 2020)</p> <p>1. Pedigerous somite 2 free in dorsal view................................................................... 2</p> <p>– Pedigerous somites 2 and 3 free in dorsal view............................................................. 8</p> <p>2. Most of urosome exposed.............................................................................. 3</p> <p>– Most of urosome hidden under body shield................................................................ 4</p> <p>3. Female antenna 3-segmented; antennule 18-segmented with aesthetasc on segment 15... Parmulella emarginata Stock, 1992</p> <p>– Female antenna 4-segmented; antennule 17-segmented with aesthetasc on segment 16............................................................................................... Neoparmulella periperiensis Farias et al. 2020</p> <p>4. Leg 3 biramous...................................................................................... 5</p> <p>– Leg 3 uniramous (Paralepeopsyllys Ummerkutty, 1960)....................................................... 6</p> <p>5. Leg 4 reduced to a knob and antennule 17-segmented............................ Parmulodes verrucosa Wilson, 1944</p> <p>– Leg 4 absent and antennule 16-segmented.............................. Parmulopsyllus iamarinoi gen. nov. sp nov.</p> <p>6. Antennule 15-segmented................................................ Paralepeopsyllys leei Lee &amp; Kim, 2017</p> <p>– Antennule 14-segmented............................................................................... 7</p> <p>7. Third exopodal segment of leg 3 with three setae.................... Paralepeopsyllus mannarensis Ummerkutty, 1960</p> <p>– Third exopodal segment of leg 3 with four spines and three setae........ Paralepeopsyllus dambayensis Lee &amp; Kim, 2017</p> <p>8. Leg 4 absent (Entomolepis Brady 1899)................................................................... 9</p> <p>– Leg 4 present....................................................................................... 10</p> <p>9. Caudal ramus 5-6 times longer than wide................................................. E. ovalis Brady, 1899</p> <p>– Caudal ramus at least 10 times longer than wide....................................... E. hamondi McKinnon, 1899</p> <p>10. Leg 4 endopod absent................................................................................ 11</p> <p>– Leg 4 endopod reduced to small segment (Lepeopsyllus Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903)................................ 12</p> <p>11. Three postgenital somites in female and four in male (Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000)............................. 13</p> <p>– Two postgenital somites in female and three in male (Entomopsyllus McKinnon, 1988)............................ 16</p> <p>12. Female antennule 15-segmented............................................. L. typicus Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903</p> <p>– Female antennule 13-segmented............................................... L. ovalis Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903</p> <p>13. Female antennule 14-segmented....................................... Spongiopsyllus atypicus Canário et al., 2019</p> <p>– Female antennule with 15 or more segments.............................................................. 14</p> <p>NEW 14. Female antennule 15-segmented...................................... Spongiopsyllus redactus Canário et al., 2012</p> <p>– Female antennule with 16 or more segments.............................................................. 15</p> <p>15. Female antennule 16-segmented............................................. Spongiopsyllus intermedius sp. nov.</p> <p>– Female antennule 17-segmented........................................ Spongiopsyllus adventicius Johnsson, 2000</p> <p>16. Endopod of P1 shorter than exopod............................................... E. nichollsi McKinnon, 1988</p> <p>– Endopod of P1 longer than exopod...................................................................... 17</p> <p>17. Female antennule 15-segmented; third exopod of leg 4 showing 2 setae........................... E. stocki Kim, 2004</p> <p>– Female antennule with more than 16 or more segments; third exopod of leg 4 showing 3 or more setae................ 18</p> <p>18. Female antennule 16-segmented; third exopod of leg 4 showing 3 setae........................ E. adriae (Eiselt, 1959)</p> <p>– Female antennule 17-segmented; third exopod of leg 4 showing 4 setae............... E. brevicaudatus Lee &amp; Kim, 2017</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03860F09FF80FFE0FF68D1F0DCA1FE20	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Borges, Camila;Farias, Amilcar;Mácola, Rosa;Neves, Elizabeth G.;Son, Rodrigo Johns-	Borges, Camila, Farias, Amilcar, Mácola, Rosa, Neves, Elizabeth G., Son, Rodrigo Johns- (2021): A new Entomolepididae genus and a new species of Spongiopsyllus Johnsson, 2000 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) and their association with Aplysina Nardo, 1834 (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4981 (2): 301-316, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4981.2.5
