identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFC1AFE04510F.text	03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFC1AFE04510F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa jabalpurensis Gajbe 2004	<div><p>Evippa jabalpurensis Gajbe, 2004</p> <p>Fig. 1</p> <p>Evippa jabalpurensis Gajbe, 2004: 10, figs 10–13.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Madhya Pradesh: Jabalpur:near <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=79.617226&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=23.115509" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 79.617226/lat 23.115509)">Shahpura</a>: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=79.617226&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=23.115509" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 79.617226/lat 23.115509)">Bilpathar</a> (23°06’55.83’’N, 79°37’02.00’’E), 373 m alt.; U.A. Gajbe leg.; 28 April 1984; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number specified), examined.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of E. jabalpurensis seem closely related to the females of E. sohani as both share a hexagonal distal part of epigynal median septum and similarly shaped spermathecae, but can be separated from the latter by the narrow proximal part of epigynal median septum (which is comparatively wide in E. sohani) (compare Fig. 1B–C with Fig. 8E–F). This difference may be attributed to intraspecific variation and this species may be a junior synonym of E. sohani; however, confirmation requires the examination of the males of E. jabalpurensis.</p> <p>Description. For description of the female, see Gajbe (2004).</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has one glass tube for this species, labeled as ‘holotype’ (no register number) containing one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs and detached opisthosoma. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia. The label in the holotype tube mentions the year of collection as ‘1982’.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFC1AFE04510F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFD14FC485457.text	03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFD14FC485457.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa Simon 1882	<div><p>Evippa Simon, 1882</p> <p>Type species. Evippa arenaria (Audouin, 1826), by subsequent designation.</p> <p>Diagnosis. For genus description and diagnosis, see Alderweireldt (1991).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE42E30FF3AFD14FC485457	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE42E32FF3AF9E2FD7151C6.text	03C487C4FFE42E32FF3AF9E2FD7151C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa rajasthanea Tikader & Malhotra 1980	<div><p>Evippa rajasthanea Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980</p> <p>Figs 2–3</p> <p>Evippa rajasthaneus Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980: 306, figs 126–130. Platnick 1989: 366.</p> <p>Evippa rajasthanea Platnick 2001.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Rajasthan: Jodhpur: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=73.04432&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=26.342703" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 73.04432/lat 26.342703)">Mandore</a> (26°20’33.73’’N, 73°02’39.56’’E), 243 m alt.; R. C. Sharma leg.; 24 August 1963; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4648/18), examined. Female paratype and two male allotypes, with the same data as the holotype, examined.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Evippa rajasthanea seem closely similar to E. praelongipes as both have a long median apophysis and epigynum with a long median septum, but can be distinguished from the latter by the following combination of features. Males: median apophysis with an apical retrolateral process and without any basal process (median apophysis of E. praelongipes with an apical prolateral process and a spine-like baso-prolateral process), and tegulum lacks additional apical process (tegulum of E. praelongipes with an additional long apico-retrolateral process near to median apophysis, compare Fig. 3B–C with Alderweireldt, 1991: fig. 5.1–2). Females: epigynal median septum with short disto-lateral processes and W-shaped posterior margin (epigynal median septum of E. praelongipes without short disto-lateral processes and with V-shaped posterior margin) and nearly globular spermathecae (E. praelongipes with nearly oval spermathecae, compare Fig. 3D, F with Alderweireldt, 1991: fig. 5.4–5).</p> <p>Description. For description of male and female, see Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980).</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has three glass tubes for this species. A tube labeled as ‘holotype’ (4648/18) contains one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs and intact genitalia. A second tube labeled as ‘paratype’ (4649/18) contains one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia. A third tube labeled as ‘allotype’ (4650/18) contains two male specimens in fairly good condition, with broken legs. In the original description, single register number was assigned for both the holotype, the paratype and the allotypes (Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980). However, the labels in the type tubes mention separate registration numbers.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE42E32FF3AF9E2FD7151C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE02E36FF3AFF1CFEFE550D.text	03C487C4FFE02E36FF3AFF1CFEFE550D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa shivajii Tikader & Malhotra 1980	<div><p>Evippa shivajii Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980</p> <p>Figs 4–6</p> <p>Evippa shivajii Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980: 312, figs 138–142.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Maharashtra: Pune (= Poona): <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=73.84457&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=18.53144" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 73.84457/lat 18.53144)">Shivajinagar</a> (= Shivaji Nagar) (18°31’53.19’’N, 73°50’40.42’’E), 558 m alt.; M.S. Malhotra leg.; 29 September 1974; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4645/18), examined. Female paratype and two male allotypes, with same data as the holotype, examined.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of E. shivajii are similar to the males of Evippa arenaria (Audouin, 1826) as both have a stout, bifid median apophysis, but can be distinguished from the latter by a claw-like prolateral protrusion of the median apophysis, which is straight in E. arenaria (compare Fig. 5C with Alderweireldt 1991: fig. 2.1). Females are similar to the females of Evippa aequalis Alderweireldt, 1991 in having balloon-like spermathecae, but can be separated from the latter by narrow proximal part of the median septum of the epigynum, which is comparatively wide in E. aequalis (compare Fig. 6A–C with Alderweireldt 1991: figs 3.4–5).</p> <p>Supplementary description. Male (allotype, Fig. 4C). Body length 4.35. Prosoma length 2.22, width 1.72. Opisthosoma length 2.13, width 1.31. Eye diameters: ALE 0.06. AME 0.11. PLE 0.41. PME 0.31. Eye interdistances: ALE–AME 0.04. AME–AME 0.06. PLE–PLE 0.54. PLE–PME 0.40. PME–PME 0.29. Chelicerae length 0.70. Clypeus height at ALE 0.13, at AME 0.12. Measurements of pedipalp and legs (all right). Pedipalp (right) 2.78 [0.90, 0.48, 0.56, 0.84], I 7.87 [2.10, 0.86, 1.82, 2.05, 1.04], II --- [2.08, 0.82, 1.56, ---, ---], III --- [2.05, 0.73, 1.67, 1.49, ---], IV --- [2.83, 0.91, 2.54, 3.76, ---]. Pedipalp as in Fig. 5A–D.</p> <p>Female (holotype, Fig. 4A). Body length 5.23. Prosoma length 2.44, width 2.08. Opisthosoma length 2.79, width 2.01. Eye diameters:ALE 0.08. AME 0.13. PLE 0.30. PME 0.32. Eye interdistances: ALE–AME 0.03. AME– AME 0.09. PLE–PLE 0.63. PLE–PME 0.44. PME–PME 0.35. Chelicerae length 0.98. Clypeus height at ALE 0.16, at AME 0.15. Measurements of palp and legs. Palp (right) 2.97 [1.01, 0.52, 0.56, 0.88], I --- [2.40, 1.05, 2.03, ---, ---], II ---, III 8.09 [2.17, 0.92, 1.81, 2.21, 0.98], IV ---. Genitalia as in Fig. 6A. Paratype (Fig. 4B) genitalia as in Fig. 6B–C.</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has three glass tubes for this species. A tube labeled as ‘holotype’ (4645/18) contains one female specimen in good condition, with broken legs and intact genitalia. A second tube labeled as ‘paratype’ (4646/18) contains one female specimen in good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia. A third tube labeled as ‘allotype’ (4647/18) contains two male specimens in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The left pedipalp of one of these specimens was found removed and kept in this tube. In the original description, single register number was assigned for both the holotype, the paratype and the allotypes (Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980). However, the labels in the type tubes mention separate registration numbers for each.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE02E36FF3AFF1CFEFE550D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE22E3BFF3AF8B2FD4F5591.text	03C487C4FFE22E3BFF3AF8B2FD4F5591.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa sohani Tikader & Malhotra 1980	<div><p>Evippa sohani Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980</p> <p>Figs 7–8</p> <p>Evippa sohani Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980: 303, figs 116–120.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Maharashtra: Ahmednagar: Ahmednagar city: Cantonment area; M.S. Malhotra leg.; 8 June 1974; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4675/18), examined. Three male allotypes, with same data as the holotype, examined.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Evippa sohani seem closely similar to E. shivajii as both have a stout median apophysis with welldeveloped protrusions, and epigynum with a squarish distal part of median septum. It can be distinguished from the latter by the following combination of features. Males: median apophysis with an additional, baso-prolateral spine-like protrusion (absent in E. shivajii) and tegulum with a short, disto-retrolateral rectangular protrusion (absent in E. shivajii, compare Fig. 5B–C with Fig. 8B–C). Females: proximal part of epigynal median septum wide (comparatively narrow in E. shivajii) and short, stout spermathecae (long, balloon-like spermathecae in E. shivajii, compare Fig. 6A–C with Fig. 8E–F).</p> <p>Supplementary description. Male (allotype, Fig. 7B). Body length 5.06. Prosoma length 2.78, width 2.12. Opisthosoma length 2.28, width 1.61. Eye diameters: ALE 0.08. AME 0.19. PLE 0.37. PME 0.38. Eye interdistances: ALE–AME 0.06. AME–AME 0.07. PLE–PLE 0.64. PLE–PME 0.45. PME–PME 0.33. Chelicerae length 0.88. Clypeus height at ALE 0.20, at AME 0.19. Measurements of pedipalp and legs. Pedipalp 3.57 [1.15, 0.67, 0.71, 1.04], I 11.24 [2.87, 1.25, 2.65, 2.93, 1.54], II 8.95 [2.72, 1.02, 2.30, 2.91, 1.59], III 11.76 [2.89, 1.04, 2.43, 3.62, 1.78], IV 16.18 [3.69, 1.25, 3.61, 5.16, 2.47]. Leg formula: 4321. Pedipalp as in Fig. 8A–D.</p> <p>Female (holotype, Fig. 7A). Body length 6.05. Prosoma length 2.78, width 2.23. Opisthosoma length 3.27, width 2.05. Eye diameters:ALE 0.10. AME 0.14. PLE 0.35. PME 0.40. Eye interdistances: ALE–AME 0.05. AME– AME 0.08. PLE–PLE 0.70. PLE–PME 0.53. PME–PME 0.32. Chelicerae length 0.95. Clypeus height at ALE 0.19, at AME 0.17. Measurements of palp and legs. Palp (right) 3.25 [1.20, 0.55, 0.54, 0.96], I --- [2.40, 1.12, ---, ---, ---], II --- [2.22, 1.01, 1.89, 1.91, ---], III --- [2.15, 0.86, 1.66, 2.07, ---], IV --- [3.12, 1.06, 2.78, 3.65, ---]. Genitalia as in Fig. 8E–F.</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has two glass tubes for this species. A tube labeled as ‘holotype’ (4675/18) contains one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia. A second tube labeled as ‘allotype’ (4676/18) contains three male specimens in good condition (but one with broken legs). In the original description, single register number was assigned for both the holotype and the allotypes (Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980). However, the labels in the type tubes mention separate registration number for holotype and the allotypes.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE22E3BFF3AF8B2FD4F5591	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFEF2E3BFF3AFD5CFD8C5283.text	03C487C4FFEF2E3BFF3AFD5CFD8C5283.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa solanensis Tikader & Malhotra 1980	<div><p>Evippa solanensis Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980</p> <p>Fig. 9</p> <p>Evippa solanensis Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980: 308, figs 131–134.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Himachal Pradesh: Chamba: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.407135&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=33.084072" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.407135/lat 33.084072)">Kilar</a> (33°05’02.67’’N, 76°24’25.68’’E), 2744 m alt.; Raj Tilak leg.; 5 September 1974; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4673/18), examined.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of E. solanensis are similar to the females of E. shivajii as both have a pentagonal distal part of epigynal median septum, but can be distinguished from the latter by short proximal part of epigynal median septum, which is long in E. shivajii, and proximally narrow spermathecae, which are nearly uniform in diameter in E. shivajii (compare Fig. 9B–C with 6A–C).</p> <p>Supplementary description. Female (holotype, Fig. 9A). Body length 5.59. Prosoma length 2.61, width 2.16. Opisthosoma length 2.98, width 1.82. Eye diameters: ALE 0.12. AME 0.14. PLE 0.29. PME 0.32. Eye interdistances: ALE–AME 0.04. AME–AME 0.07. PLE–PLE 0.64. PLE–PME 0.43. PME–PME 0.36. Chelicerae length 1.02. Clypeus height at ALE 0.22, at AME 0.20. Measurements of palp and legs. Palp 3.32 [1.08, 0.64, 0.64, 0.96], I ---, II ---, III --- [2.48, 1.02, 2.08, 2.45, ---], IV --- [3.50, 1.25, 3.06, 3.92, ---]. Genitalia as in Fig. 9B–C.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has one glass tube for this species, labeled as ‘holotype’ (4673/18) and containing one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFEF2E3BFF3AFD5CFD8C5283	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFEF2E3AFF3AF9F2FD8C56E1.text	03C487C4FFEF2E3AFF3AF9F2FD8C56E1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Wadicosa fidelis (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1872)	<div><p>Wadicosa fidelis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872)</p> <p>Fig. 10</p> <p>Lycosa fidelis O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872: 319.</p> <p>Wadicosa fidelis Kronestedt &amp; Zyuzin 2009: 818, figs 1–20 (for complete list of references, see World Spider Catalog 2021). Evippa mandlaensis Gajbe, 2004: 8, figs 6–9. New synonymy</p> <p>Type material. E. mandlaensis. Female holotype from INDIA: Madhya Pradesh: Mandla (= Mandala): Narayanganj (22°49’38.41’’N, 80°14’10.73’’E), 431 m alt.; U.A. Gajbe leg.; 23 January 1985; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number specified), examined. W. fidelis. Lectotype male from ‘Palestine’ (OXUM, collection of O. Pickard-Cambridge: bottle 1572, tube 39), not examined. Kronestedt &amp; Zyuzin (2009) illustrated the male and female genitalia of this species and their female genitalic illustrations (Kronestedt &amp; Zyuzin 2009: figs 15, 17) were used for comparative purpose.</p> <p>Justification of the synonymy. Gajbe (2004) described E. mandlaensis based on a female specimen collected in Madhya Pradesh. Detailed examination of the holotype showed no differences between this species and W. fidelis, a widely distributed species, which was previously recorded from India (Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980; Lu et al. 2016) (compare Fig. 10B–C with Kronestedt &amp; Zyuzin 2009: figs 15, 17). Thus, we consider E. mandlaensis as a junior synonym of W. fidelis.</p> <p>Remarks. The NZC-ZSI collection has one glass tube for E. mandlaensis, labeled as ‘holotype’ (Ar-1621) and containing one female specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs. The same tube has a small glass vial containing the dissected genitalia.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFEF2E3AFF3AF9F2FD8C56E1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE92E3CFF3AF808FB6C5417.text	03C487C4FFE92E3CFF3AF808FB6C5417.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa praelongipes (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871)	<div><p>Evippa praelongipes (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871)</p> <p>Lycosa praelongipes O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871: 822, plate L, fig. 3.</p> <p>Pardosa praelongipes Schmidt 1895: 476.</p> <p>Evippa praelongipes Simon 1897: 290. Roewer 1959: 182, fig. 93. Denis 1966: 127, fig. 44. Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980: 311, figs 135–137. Alderweireldt 1991: 369, fig. 5.1–5. Armiach Steinpress et al. 2021: 113, figs 3B, 4D, 5D, 6D, 7D, 8D, 10D, 11D, 14A.</p> <p>Remarks. This species was described based on a male specimen (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871). In India, it was reported to occur in Assam, Gujarat and Rajasthan (Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980). The female epigynum illustrated for this species by Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980) is based on specimens collected by E. Simon from Pakistan. It is deviating from the epigynum of E. praelongipes illustrated by Alderweireldt (1991) and instead shows close resemblance with the female genitalia of E. rajasthanea (compare Fig. 3D with Alderweireldt 1991: fig. 5.4; Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980: fig. 137), indicating that Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980) misidentified the species (see also Armiach Steinpress et al. 2021). The specimens collected in Assam, Gujarat and Rajasthan (which has the type locality of E. rajasthanea), which are never illustrated and might be identified by comparison with the specimens from Pakistan, may also be that of E. rajasthanea. All these make the record of E. praelongipes in India doubtful. The NZC-ZSI collection has two glass tubes labeled as E. praelongipes. A tube (7749/H2) contains one female specimen in bad condition. The same tube has a small glass vial without genitalia. A second tube (7749/H2) contains one dried female specimen and a female prosoma. The label in this tube mentions the collecting locality as Kuchh, which is in Gujarat. We were unable to confirm whether these specimens are of E. praelongipes or not due to their bad condition.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE92E3CFF3AF808FB6C5417	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE82E3CFF3AFC16FAD551FA.text	03C487C4FFE82E3CFF3AFC16FAD551FA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa banarensis Tikader & Malhotra 1980	<div><p>Evippa banarensis Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980</p> <p>Fig. 11B, E–F</p> <p>Evippa banarensis Tikader &amp; Malhotra, 1980: 305, figs 121–125.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype from INDIA: Rajasthan: Jodhpur: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=73.152664&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=26.343067" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 73.152664/lat 26.343067)">Banar village</a> (26°20’35.04’’N, 73°09’09.58’’E), 214 m alt.; V. C. Agarwal (Agrawal?) leg.; 7 July 1967; repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (4643/18), not examined. Male allotype with same data as the holotype, examined.</p> <p>Remarks. The holotype tube (4643/18) for this species in the NZC-ZSI collection contains, instead of an Evippa species as illustrated in Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980: figs 121–124), a female specimen that has all the diagnostic features of Geolycosa Montgomery, 1904: anteriorly elevated prosoma, shape of epigynal median septum and shape and orientation of spermathecae (Fig. 11A, C–D). This indicates that the holotype female of E. banarensis may either be lost or misplaced elsewhere in the collection. The tube with the register number ‘4644/18’ contains one bad specimen and since this tube is labeled as allotype, we presumed that it is the male of E. banarensis (Fig. 11B), but with lost pedipalps.</p> <p>The genitalia originally illustrated for E. banarensis seem extremely similar to the genitalia of E. rajasthanea by having a retrolaterally oriented long median apophysis of pedipalp and a long median epigynal septum, with short disto-lateral extensions and W-shaped posterior border (compare Fig. 3B–D with Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980: figs 123, 125). It can be separated from the latter species only by slight differences such as apically pointed median apophysis without any retrolateral process (median apophysis of E. rajasthanea with smoothly rounded apex and with a retrolateral process) and diverging spermathecae (E. rajasthanea with parallel spermathecae, compare Fig. 3B, F with Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980: figs 123, 125). These differences, however, may be attributed to intraspecific variations or due to poor illustrations lacking details and the species E. banarensis may be a junior synonym of E. rajasthanea; however, confirmation requires the examination of type or topotype material of E. banarensis.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE82E3CFF3AFC16FAD551FA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
03C487C4FFE82E3FFF3AF8B4FB5056E0.text	03C487C4FFE82E3FFF3AF8B4FB5056E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Evippa rubiginosa Simon 1885	<div><p>Evippa rubiginosa Simon, 1885</p> <p>Evippa rubiginosa Simon, 1885: 11. Gravely 1924: 611, fig. 5E. Tikader &amp; Malhotra 1980: 313, figs 143–145.</p> <p>Type material. Syntype female from INDIA: Andhra Pradesh: Anantapur: Vajrakarur near <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=77.39166&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=15.023334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 77.39166/lat 15.023334)">Guntakal</a> (15°01’24’’N, 77°23’30’’E), 446 m alt.; M.M. Chaper leg.; date unknown; repository MNHN, Paris (6995), not examined.</p> <p>Remarks. The title of the paper in which Simon (1885) described E. rubiginosa mentions the collecting locality of this species as ‘Wagra-Karoor près Gundacul’, which can be the present day ‘Vajrakarur near Guntakal’ and is currently located in the Anantapur district in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, and not in the Bellary district in the Indian state of Karnataka. Gravely (1924) and Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980) mentioned the type locality of this species as Guntakal, in Andhra Pradesh. Even though Tikader &amp; Malhotra (1980) illustrated the female genitalia of the syntype of this species, it is highly schematic, lacking diagnostic details to identify this species. The NZC-ZSI collection has one glass tube labeled as E. rubiginosa (7703/H2) collected in Naga Hills district (formerly Samaguting = Samagooting) of Assam by Godwin-Austin (?Godwin-Austen) (see also Gravely 1924). The tube was found empty and the specimen may either be lost or misplaced elsewhere in the collection. The current taxonomic placement of this species remains unchallenged until the examination of its type or topotype material.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C4FFE82E3FFF3AF8B4FB5056E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Caleb, John T. D.;Sebastian, Pothalil A.	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D., Sebastian, Pothalil A. (2021): Notes on Indian wolf spiders: I. Genus Evippa Simon, 1882 (Araneae: Lycosidae Evippinae). Zootaxa 4975 (1): 159-175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4975.1.6
