taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
926087BC1608FFEDFCD4FACEFD9FFAF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1609FFEDFF18F9E9FB65F934.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160FFFEBFF1EFB4DFB9CFE06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160FFFEBFD16FE36FB88FB9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160FFFEBFFC2FF3BFE83FC7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160FFFE8FD46FB2DFC37F934.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538602/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538602	FIG. 2. — A, One of the syntypes of Hornera porosa identified as Hornera cf. verrucosa Reuss, 1847 due to the poor preservation and the lack of a gonozooecium;B-F, Lunulites latdorfensis Stoliczka, 1862; B, general view showing typical preservation, the central part sometimes revealing a preserved lithoclast; C, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; D, vibracular zooecia, with triangular shape and distinct condyles; E, autozooecia showing granular cryptocyst and position of the vibracular zooecia; F, abfrontal (reverse) side of colony showing a single row of pores in each basal sector. Scale bars: A-C, F, 1 mm; D, E, 100 μm.	FIG. 2. — A, One of the syntypes of Hornera porosa identified as Hornera cf. verrucosa Reuss, 1847 due to the poor preservation and the lack of a gonozooecium;B-F, Lunulites latdorfensis Stoliczka, 1862; B, general view showing typical preservation, the central part sometimes revealing a preserved lithoclast; C, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; D, vibracular zooecia, with triangular shape and distinct condyles; E, autozooecia showing granular cryptocyst and position of the vibracular zooecia; F, abfrontal (reverse) side of colony showing a single row of pores in each basal sector. Scale bars: A-C, F, 1 mm; D, E, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160DFFE9FF12FEB4FDA5FC1C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538600/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538600	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	FIG. 1. — A, Exidmonea hoernesi (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype showing diagnostic features: one aperture, close to the dorsal side of the colony, which is always arranged outside the fascicle; B, Exidmonea giebeli (Stoliczka, 1862), general view of holotype; C, D, holotype of Filisparsa tenella identified as Filisparsa? sp. due to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium; E, one of the syntypes of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera identified as Mecynoecia cf. pulchella (Reuss, 1847) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; F, holotype of Pustulopora attenuate identified as Mecynoecia cf. proboscidea (Milne-Edwards, 1838) owing to the lack of a gonozooecium; G, H, syntype of Alveolaria Buski identified as?Bobiesipora fasciculata (Reuss, 1848); J, holotype of Heteropora similis Stoliczka, 1862, identified as nomen dubium due to the very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features; K, L, holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina identified as “Disporella anhaltina (Stoliczka, 1862)” nomen dubium owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Scale bars: A-G, 1 mm; H-L, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160DFFE9FF02FB2EFB60FE47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538602/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538602	FIG. 2. — A, One of the syntypes of Hornera porosa identified as Hornera cf. verrucosa Reuss, 1847 due to the poor preservation and the lack of a gonozooecium;B-F, Lunulites latdorfensis Stoliczka, 1862; B, general view showing typical preservation, the central part sometimes revealing a preserved lithoclast; C, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; D, vibracular zooecia, with triangular shape and distinct condyles; E, autozooecia showing granular cryptocyst and position of the vibracular zooecia; F, abfrontal (reverse) side of colony showing a single row of pores in each basal sector. Scale bars: A-C, F, 1 mm; D, E, 100 μm.	FIG. 2. — A, One of the syntypes of Hornera porosa identified as Hornera cf. verrucosa Reuss, 1847 due to the poor preservation and the lack of a gonozooecium;B-F, Lunulites latdorfensis Stoliczka, 1862; B, general view showing typical preservation, the central part sometimes revealing a preserved lithoclast; C, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; D, vibracular zooecia, with triangular shape and distinct condyles; E, autozooecia showing granular cryptocyst and position of the vibracular zooecia; F, abfrontal (reverse) side of colony showing a single row of pores in each basal sector. Scale bars: A-C, F, 1 mm; D, E, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC160DFFE7FD5AFA09FDF4FB1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538604/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538604	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1603FFE7FD19FCD2FCBBF934.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538604/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538604	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1603FFE7FF16FAAFFBA3FD7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538604/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538604	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	FIG. 3. — A, Lectotype of Eschara reussi identified as Steginoporella cf. reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003 showing large avicularia (top and lower right) and elevated distal zooecial rims; B-D, Adeonella ornatissima (Stoliczka,1862); B, general view of lectotype with autozooecia and maternal zooecia; C, maternal zooecia showing the characteristic semilunar aperture and autozooecia with a deep narrow sinus; D, lectotype designated here as older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification producing a transverse apertural bar; E, F, Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; E, general view of lectotype showing autozooecia with two suboral avicularia and large maternal zooecia; F, maternal zooecium with very large aperture (partly broken) and autozooecia with a narrow sinus. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 1 mm; C, F, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1600FFE4FFC7FAAFFB62F934.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538606/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538606	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1601FFE5FF1DFF3BFC71FD39.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538606/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538606	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1606FFE2FFC4FCF1FC25F934.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538606/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538606	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	FIG. 4. — A, Adeonellopsis pulchra (Stoliczka, 1862) n. comb., lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; B, interior view of holotype of Lepralia pedicularis showing elongate zooecial chambers with mixed frontal shields and scattered lepralioid pseudopores; due to the very poor preservation and the absence any other characteristic features described here as “Lepralia pedicularis Stoliczka, 1862” nomen dubium; C-G, Stoliczkella subovata (Stoliczka,1862) n. comb.;C, general view of lectotype;D, detail of three autozooecia showing deeply immersed apertures and a proximal pair of frontal areolar pores;E, autozooecial aperture showing a Y-shaped denticle;F, autozooecial aperture showing spiraminal openings produced by fusion of lateral processes, proximal to which is a suboral avicularium; G, interior of the autozooecium showing umbonuloid surface and primary aperture with slightly convex proximal margin. Scale bars:100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1607FFE3FC94FE17FCCAFA11.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538612/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538612	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1607FFE3FFC7FF34FCA8FEC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538608/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538608	FIG. 5. — Stoliczkella crenatula (Stoliczka,1862),n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecial apertures with suboral avicularia smaller than those in Stoliczkella subovata n. comb. (cf. Fig. 3F); C, partly preserved ooecium; D, older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification; E, autozooecia with deeply immersed ooecia and small avicularia; F, autozooecial aperture with proximal depression accommodating areolar pores. Scale bars: A, D, 1 mm; B, C, E, F, 100 μm.	FIG. 5. — Stoliczkella crenatula (Stoliczka,1862),n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecial apertures with suboral avicularia smaller than those in Stoliczkella subovata n. comb. (cf. Fig. 3F); C, partly preserved ooecium; D, older stage of colony development showing secondary calcification; E, autozooecia with deeply immersed ooecia and small avicularia; F, autozooecial aperture with proximal depression accommodating areolar pores. Scale bars: A, D, 1 mm; B, C, E, F, 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1607FFE1FD57F9C9FD5FFE86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538612/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538612	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1605FFE1FFCFFE36FC0EFEC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538612/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538612	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC1605FFFFFC83FE17FF26FEA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538612/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538612	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	FIG. 6. – A-D, Anarthropora macropora (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; A, general view of lectotype; B, autozooecium showing frontal foramina and suboral avicularium; C, syntype showing quincuncial arrangement of autozooecia; D, frontal-shield foramen showing well-preserved radial denticulation;E, F, Escharella grotriani (Stoliczka,1862);E, lectotype showing arrangement of autozooecia; F, zooecium with ooecium and oral spines; G, H, Myriapora? beyrichi (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb.; G, lectotype showing smooth outlines of autozooecia; H, detail of aperture with condyles typical of myriaporids; I, J, syntype of Eschara porulosa identified as Tubucella mammillaris (Milne Edwards, 1836); I, general view of chosen lectotype of synonymous Eschara porulosa Stoliczka, 1862; J, lateral view of colony showing autozooecia with large apertures. Scale bars: 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
926087BC161BFFFAFD41F9E9FDA6FBBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538616/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538616	FIG. 8. — Stichoporina reussi Stoliczka, 1862; A, lectotype colony; B, colony margin showing budding pattern; C, a smaller syntype colony; D, detail of ooecium; E, abfrontal view of colony showing a single pore in zooecial basal wall; F, transverse section of colony showing arrangement of autozooecia in one row with a highly calcified central part; G, section showing internal view of autozooecia. Scale bars: 100 μm.	FIG. 8. — Stichoporina reussi Stoliczka, 1862; A, lectotype colony; B, colony margin showing budding pattern; C, a smaller syntype colony; D, detail of ooecium; E, abfrontal view of colony showing a single pore in zooecial basal wall; F, transverse section of colony showing arrangement of autozooecia in one row with a highly calcified central part; G, section showing internal view of autozooecia. Scale bars: 100 μm.	2014-12-26	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.		Zenodo	biologists	Zágoršek, Kamil;Gordon, Dennis P.			
