taxonID	type	description	language	source
926087BC1608FFEDFCD4FACEFD9FFAF1.taxon	description	(Fig. 1 C, D)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1608FFEDFCD4FACEFD9FFAF1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Filisparsa tenella, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0049.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1608FFEDFCD4FACEFD9FFAF1.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony short, erect, with autozooecial apertures arranged in rows. Peristomes slightly curving laterally from colony axis. Frontal wall with pseudopores; boundaries between autozooecial tubes indistinct. Dorsal side of colony smooth, slightly ribbed. Gonozooecium not known. REMARKS Owing to the poor preservation and lack of the gonozooecium, the exact determination remains uncertain, but the arrangement of the autozooecia mostly resembles those in Filisparsa, even though the type species is Cretaceous. Ŋere is also some similarity to Tervia serrata (Reuss, 1869) in which, however, the V outline of the autozooecial tubes is observable on the dorsal side of the branch.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1609FFEDFF18F9E9FB65F934.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two colonies of Pustulopora (Clausa) retifera, both lacking a gonozooecium, are registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0047. Owing to taxonomic uncertainty, no lectotype of Stoliczka’s species has been selected.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1609FFEDFF18F9E9FB65F934.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colonies branches broken into a short length, with 12 - 14 autozooecial tubes arranged around branch axis. Tubes narrow, short, with circular to oval aperture. Apertures are very densely arranged, situated on short peristomes. Frontal walls short, slightly convex, smooth, sparsely perforated by small pseudopores. Gonozooecium lacking.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1609FFEDFF18F9E9FB65F934.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe arrangement of zooecia very closely resembles that in Mecynoecia pulchella, which is very common in tertiary sediments of Paratethys (see Zágoršek 2010). Insofar as gonozooecia are lacking in any of the Stoliczka specimens, the identification is not certain.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFF1EFB4DFB9CFE06.taxon	description	(Fig. 1 G, H)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFF1EFB4DFB9CFE06.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Four syntypes of Alveolaria buski registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0055. No lectotype selected.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFF1EFB4DFB9CFE06.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony with a large circular encrusting basal part. Branches with zooecial tubes irregularly arranged around base. Branches often bifurcate, perforated by many kenozooecia and apertures in fascicles. Fascicles corresponding with a keel on dorsal surface of colony. Gonozooecium not observed.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFF1EFB4DFB9CFE06.taxon	discussion	REMARKS In the absence of a gonozooecium in the Stoliczka specimens, the attribution to Bobiesipora remains uncertain. However, all other features (arrangement of apertures, branches and kenozooecia) show high similarities with Bobiesipora fasciculata.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFD16FE36FB88FB9D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Heteropora similis, registered as 1859 / 0026 / 0138.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFD16FE36FB88FB9D.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Small fragments of columnar colony with oval transverse section. Zooecia of two types, the larger perhaps autozooecia, the smaller probably kenozooecia. No gonozooecium.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFD16FE36FB88FB9D.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Owing to very poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium or any other characteristic features, the specimen is unrecognizable. Ŋe arrangement of apertures on the colony surface is cerioporine, somewhat comparable with Tetrocycloecia and / or Heteropora (see Zágoršek 2003, 2010).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFFC2FF3BFE83FC7D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. Holotype of Pustulopora attenuata, registered as 2010 / 259 / 16 A.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFFC2FF3BFE83FC7D.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony with four autozooecial tubes arranged around branch axis. Tubes very long, with circular to oval aperture situated on long peristomes. Frontal walls long, convex. Gonozooecium not developed.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFEBFFC2FF3BFE83FC7D.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe arrangement of zooecia very closely resembles that in Mecynoecia proboscidea, which is one of the commonest cyclostomes species in the Eocene (see Zágoršek 2003). Insofar as no gonozooecium is known in any of the Stoliczka specimens, the identification is not certain. Registered as 2010 / 259 / 16 B are unrecognizable cheilostomes with a similar arrangement of zooecia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFE8FD46FB2DFC37F934.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two syntypes of Hornera porosa registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0048. Owing to the lack of gonozooecia and unclear attribution of the species, no lectotype has been selected.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFE8FD46FB2DFC37F934.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Apertures circular, alternating, forming more or less transverse rows. Cancelli of almost the same size, one proximal and one distal to the aperture. Dorsal side of colony with rare, scattered cancelli and anastomosing, wide, smooth nervi. Gonozooecia lacking in the Stoliczka specimens.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160FFFE8FD46FB2DFC37F934.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Owing to poor preservation and the lack of a gonozooecium, plus the unrecognisable type material of Reuss (1847), the species cannot be clearly identified. Moreover, Hornera verrucosa seems to represent an unresolved nomenclatural problem. Reuss (1847) described Hornera verrucosa as occurring in the Vienna Basin (Miocene). Reuss (1851) later described other specimens from the Miocene of Poland as Hornera verrucosa [but not sensu Reuss (1847)] and, moreover, further described Hornera verrucosa sensu Reuss (1851) from Söllingen (Oligocene). Reuss (1866) stated that the species occurred from Early through Late Oligocene and the Miocene, even though all these specimens may represent different species. Smith et al. (2008) synonymized these three descriptions as one species (sensu Reuss 1847). Resolving this problem requires a thorough revision of the whole concept of Neogene Hornera, which is beyond the scope of this paper. Because of this imprecise determination of the species, Hornera verrucosa has subsequently often been reported from Neogene (e. g., Bobies 1958; Vávra 1977; Zágoršek 2010) as well as Eocene sediments (Zágoršek 2001, 2003).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF12FEB4FDA5FC1C.taxon	description	(Fig. 1 K, L)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF12FEB4FDA5FC1C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Pavotubigera anhaltina, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0052.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF12FEB4FDA5FC1C.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Small fragments of discoidal colony with autozooecia in radial fascicles. Fascicles comprising 1 - 2 parallel rows of apertures, slightly curving from centre of colony. Gonozooecium lacking.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF12FEB4FDA5FC1C.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe specimen is more or less unrecognizable owing to poor preservation and the absence of a gonozooecium. Ŋe arrangement of fascicles, however, resembles some species of Disporella (see Disporella radiata in Zágoršek [2003] and Disporella hispida in Zágoršek [2010]).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF02FB2EFB60FE47.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Nine syntypes registered as 1867 / 0012 / 0018; five of them belong to Lunulites latdorfensis. A lectotype (Fig. 2 C; designated here) has been selected from them that corresponds closely with Stoliczka (1862: pl. 3, fig. 7). Ŋe other four specimens belong to different species of Lunulites.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF02FB2EFB60FE47.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony small, discoidal, always preserved intact. Autozooecia in very regular concentric rows, about 4 - 5 per colony. No budding from the fragments observed. Autozooecia roundly rectangular with granular frontal wall. Orifice semicircular. Vibracula small, acutely triangular. Dorsal side comprising sectors as wide as an autozooecium and arranged more or less radially, slightly chaotically curved. Only one row of pores per sector.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FF02FB2EFB60FE47.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe most characteristic features are: small colonies with very regularly arranged concentric rows of autozooecia, small triangular vibracula and one row of pores per sector.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FD0EFD90FB86FAD0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Membranipora (Semiflustrella) anhaltina, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0054. DIAGNOSIS. — Colony erect, multiserial, with flat cross section. Autozooecia hexagonal to oval, slightly longer than wide with large, semilunar opesia. Cryptocyst extensive, shallow, flat and smooth. Vicarious avicularium as long as but half as wide as autozooecium; orifice of vicarious avicularium small, circular, or seldom narrow and oval; rostrum very long, acute distally and usually curved laterally.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE9FD0EFD90FB86FAD0.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe Stoliczka specimen is identical with the material described by Braga (1980) and Zágoršek (2001, 2003) as Onychocella subpyriformis (d’Archiac, 1846). As Braga (1980) pointed out, O. subpyriformis is quite variable and one of the commonest Eocene species in the Alpine Carpathians region.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE7FD5AFA09FDF4FB1F.taxon	description	(Fig. 3 A)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE7FD5AFA09FDF4FB1F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two syntypes of Eschara reussi registered as 1859 / 0026 / 0136. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) is illustrated in Fig. 3 A.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE7FD5AFA09FDF4FB1F.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony erect, columnar, multiserial, large with oval to circular transverse section. Autozooecia oval to hexagonal, arranged in nine regular longitudinal rows. Mural rim wide and smooth. Cryptocyst shallow, perforated by 7 - 12 large pores but lacking opesiules. Orifice sunken, subcircular in shape, situated on the end of short peristome, bordered by a thin low rim. Ŋe vicarious avicularia (Bzooecia) up to twice as long and wide as autozooecia, with broad, truncate distal margin; cryptocyst perforated by about tenpores; palate wider than long, smooth, shallowly concave. Owing to poor preservation, opesial characters of vicariousaviculariaaresomewhatequivocalbutpolypidetube is well developed, its orifice similar to that of autozooecia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC160DFFE7FD5AFA09FDF4FB1F.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Zágoršek (2003) synonymised this species with Steginoporella haidingeri (sensu Reuss 1848). SEM study of Stoliczka’s material, however, shows features more reminiscent of Steginoporella reingruberhohensis Zágoršek, 2003. Ŋe main difference is the number of cryptocystal perforations. Whereas S. haidingeri usually has about 20 - 30 pores, S. reingruberhohensis has about 10 - 15, which is closer to the number (7 - 12) in Eschara reussi. Owing to the unclear cryptocystal features of the vicarious avicularia, these two species cannot presently be synonymised and the status of Eschara reussi remains unclear. David & Pouyet (1974) and Pouyet & David (1979) synonymised Eschara reussi Stoliczka, 1862 with Steginoporella cucullata (Reuss, 1848). As already discussed by Zágoršek (2003), S. cucullata has a very wide mural rim, a consistently preserved pair of circular opesiules, and a wide vicarious avicularian palate. It is, moreover, a Miocene species.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FD19FCD2FCBBF934.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two syntypes registered as 1859 / 0026 / 0137. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 6) and is depicted as Figure 3 E herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FD19FCD2FCBBF934.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony erect, multiserial. Autozooecia may be rhomboidal in central part of colony, more elongate on colony margin. Frontal shield granular, perforated by marginal areolar-septular pores. Orifice with transversely D-shaped anter and narrow sinus. Adventitious avicularia small, paired, one on either side suborally. Maternal zooecia up to more than twice as wide distally as autozooecia, with smooth ooecial margin much wider than long, showing beneath distal secondary calcification. Secondary zooecial calcification often accompanied by tubercles situated usually in margins and / or on frontal shield including loci of suboral avicularia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FD19FCD2FCBBF934.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋis species differs from A. ornatissima in having very large maternal zooecia, longer autozooecia with granular frontal shields, and suboral (not lateral-oral) avicularia. It is similar also to Adeonella minor (Reuss, 1869) which, however, never has such large brooding zooids and the apertural sinus is less prominent.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FF16FAAFFBA3FD7A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two syntypes registered as 2010 / 0259 / 0010. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 7) and is depicted in Figure 3 D herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FF16FAAFFBA3FD7A.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony erect, flat, multiserial, bifurcating, with 8 - 10 longitudinal rows of autozooecia. Autozooecia at colony margin can be more than twice as long as those in colony centre. Frontal shield without granulations, knobbly, perforated by marginal areolar pores; lateral tubercles sometimes developing when secondary calcification occurs; frontal area relatively narrow in zooecia located in middle part of colony. Orifice oval to suborbicular with broad poster. Lateral-oral pair of avicularia small, circular, often fusing as bridge across aperture in older parts of colony. Secondary calcification often expressed as well-developed tubercles situated usually in corners of zooecia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1603FFE7FF16FAAFFBA3FD7A.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Adeonella ornatissima differs from Adeonella mortisaga (Stoliczka, 1862), n. comb. in having shorter autozooecia with a knobbly frontal shield and oral avicularia that may fuse across the aperture.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1600FFE4FFC7FAAFFB62F934.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Ŋree syntypes registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0056. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 10) and is depicted as Figure 4 A herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1600FFE4FFC7FAAFFB62F934.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony columnar, multiserial with 6 - 8 autozooecial rows. Autozooecia elongate-oval with thick raised margins and very small areolar-septular pores in interzooidal furrows. Frontal shield mostly occupied by a very large spiraminal area with 12 - 16 perforations. Aperture semilunar to semicircular, narrow. Avicularia mostly median suboral, more or less transversely orientated with a very short acute rostrum; mostly eroded and represented by a subcircular foramen, this only slightly larger than spiraminal pores in some zooecia. Gonozooecium unknown.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1600FFE4FFC7FAAFFB62F934.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Adeonellopsis pulchra n. comb. differs from other similar species in having a small avicularium and a large spiraminal area, perforated by more than 12 pores (Fig. 4 A), that leaves a very narrow remaining area of frontal shield that comprises a raised rim.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE5FF1DFF3BFC71FD39.taxon	description	(Fig. 4 B)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE5FF1DFF3BFC71FD39.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Lepralia pedicularis, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0053.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE5FF1DFF3BFC71FD39.taxon	description	DESCRIPTION Colony robust, erect, bifurcating, exteriorly heavily secondarily calcified and rather densely perforated by tiny pores, some of which are in linear series. Obvious autozooecial boundaries are lacking although very thin, faint lines may be indicative; no other exterior features are visible. Interior view of a fracture shows parts of several elongate zooecial chambers with undersides of mixed frontal shields excluding orifices; each shows the internal openings of sparsely scattered lepralioid pseudopores and a small oval umbonuloid area of planar-spherulitic microstructure, bounded by a ring scar and in the centre of which is a foramen. Interzooecial communications via simple, uniporous pore.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE5FF1DFF3BFC71FD39.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe internal opening surrounded by a small umbonuloid area of exterior skeletal wall is highly distinctive. Ŋe only other known example at the present time is a species of Siphonicytara (Gordon & Taylor in press), from the Early Eocene of Chatham Island, New Zealand, which has an identical arrangement. Insofar as all other examined species of Siphonicytara Busk, 1884 have an ascopore, Gordon & Taylor interpreted the foramen as technically a spiraminal opening and that the genus evolved from a fully umbonuloid ancestor, perhaps resembling Beisselina Canu, 1913.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE2FC95FCB1FE90FD59.taxon	materials_examined	TYPE SPECIES. — Eschara (Flustrina) subovata Stoliczka, 1862.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE2FC95FCB1FE90FD59.taxon	etymology	ETYMOLOGY. — Honorific for Ferdinand Stoliczka (Czech, Stolička), 7 June 1838 - 19 June 1874, a Moravian paleontologist who worked in India on paleontology, geology and various aspects of zoology, including ornithology and herpetology. He died of high-altitude sickness, at the early age of 36, during an expedition across the Himalayas.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE2FC95FCB1FE90FD59.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Erect, bilamellar colonies with median lamina and narrow, flat or with lensoidal cross section. Autozooecia umbonuloid, frontally imperforate apart from marginal areolar-septular pores. Aperture with median and lateral processes forming paired peristomial spiramina. Large suboral avicularia and imperforate immersed ooecium. Additional adventitious and vicarious avicularia may be present, the latter larger than autozooecia and situated along the colony margin.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1601FFE2FC95FCB1FE90FD59.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe apertural features of Stoliczkella n. gen. superficially resemble some species of the genus Galeopsis Jullien & Calvet, 1903 (Celleporidae), in which paired lateral-oral avicularia can fuse across the aperture forming a bridge and peristomial spiramen. In Stoliczkella n. gen., a median process fuses with a pair of lateral processes to form a double spiramen and the apertural avicularium is single and median-suboral. Further, the frontal shield is umbonuloid with a distinct ring scar surrounding an area of planar-spherulitic ultrastructure on the undersurface, whereas the frontal shield in Galeopsis is lepralioid-cryptocystidean. Ŋe double apertural spiramen resembles similar arrangements in some species of Exochella Jullien, 1888 (Romancheinidae), but the median suboral avicularium and erect habit suggest Bryocryptellidae. It may be that these two families (Romancheinidae Jullien, 1888 and Bryocryptellidae Vigneaux, 1949) should be merged but the type species of the type genera do not suggest a close relationship. Stoliczkella n. gen. is introduced here for two species described by Stoliczka (1862).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1606FFE2FFC4FCF1FC25F934.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Seven specimens labelled as Eschara (Flustrina) subovata registered as 2010 / 0259 / 0006, but only five may be regarded as syntypes. Two specimens belong to the genus Reteporella. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 9) and is depicted as Figure 4 B herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1606FFE2FFC4FCF1FC25F934.taxon	description	DESCRIPTION Colony erect, bilamellar, flat or with lensoidal cross section, with zooecial orientation indicative of potential bifurcation distally, autozooecia opening on both faces. Autozooecia somewhat elongateoval (especially in interior view) to rhomboidal, although exterior boundary lines can disappear with secondary calcification. Frontal shield umbonuloid, frontally smooth, convex, imperforate except for tiny marginal areolar pores, these often tending to be lacking laterally, paired proximally. Interior view shows a large area of planar-spherulitic microstructure bordered by a ring scar. Peristomial aperture shows a proximal median process that may or may not have 2 – 3 slight projections distally; median process fusing with a projection from either side to form a pair of spiramina; this arrangement more clearly seen from interior view, with the median process sometimes grooved. ‘ Primary orifice’ (observable from interior view) semicircular with slightly convex proximal margin. Oral spines absent. Median suboral avicularium relatively large, subcircular, rostrum proximofrontally directed, crossbar mostly broken. Ooecium deeply immersed, recumbent on distal zooecium, ectooecium imperforate, typically somewhat concealed by secondary calcification. Additional smaller adventitious avicularia, circular, sparsely found laterofrontally or proximally on frontal shield, with rostrum directed obliquely laterally or proximally. Vicarious avicularia situated on margin of the colony, these larger than autozooecia with a rounded rostrum and oval aperture.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1606FFE2FFC4FCF1FC25F934.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Two species occurred in a single box with the same name (Eschara (Flustrina) subovata) and registration number. Five specimens are Stoliczkella subovata n. comb. and correspond with Stoliczka’s original description and illustrations. Ŋe remaining two specimens belong to Reteporella and comprise colony fragments with apertures opening only on one side. Ŋese two specimens were erroneously cited as Eschara (Flustrina) subovata by Zágoršek (2001, 2003) and listed under Reteporella. According to Stoliczka’s original description and illustration, Eschara (Flustrina) subovata has bilamellar colonies (with a medial lamella) that definitely do not belong to Phidoloporidae; the species described as Reteporella subovata from Eocene sediments of Reingruberhohe (Zágoršek 2003) and Buda Marls (Zágoršek 2001) may represent a new species of Reteporella. Ŋe specimen described by Zágoršek (2003) as Galeopsis cf. subquadrangularis (Reuss) corresponds to Stoliczkella subovata n. comb. in having elongateoval autozooecia, large suboral avicularia and one pair of areolar septular pores in the proximal part of the autozooecium. Although adventitious and vicarious avicularia have not been observed in the Reingruberhohe specimens, we believe they belong to Stoliczkella subovata n. comb.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FC94FE17FCCAFA11.taxon	description	(Fig. 6 A-D)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FC94FE17FCCAFA11.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Ŋree syntypes, registered as 1859 / 0026 / 0140. Ŋe selected lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 3) and is depicted as Figure 6 A herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FC94FE17FCCAFA11.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony encrusting, autozooecia suboval, arranged in irregular longitudinal rows. Frontal shield coarsely perforated by 8 - 12 large excavations, each bowl-shaped with a broad smooth rim and the sides sloping to a smaller hole edged with several blunt denticles, these conferring a stellate appearance to each foramen. Peristomial aperture subcircular to transversely oval, with low rim; deeper interior proximal margin of aperture straight with tiny separated denticles along its edge. No oral spines. Small avicularian chamber on mid-distal rim of peristome; a larger avicularium situated suborally at one corner of the aperture, the rostrum long, acute, directed laterally, no crossbar or pivots. No ooecia observed.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FC94FE17FCCAFA11.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Recent Anarthropora monodon Busk, 1860 (type species) differs in having a much more densely foraminate frontal shield and smaller peristomial avicularia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FFC7FF34FCA8FEC6.taxon	description	(Fig. 5 A-F)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FFC7FF34FCA8FEC6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Five syntypes, registered as 2010 / 0259 / 0007. Stoliczka’s (1862) illustration does not correspond exactly to any of the specimens labelled as Eschara crenatula, hence the illustrated specimen may be lost, or Stoliczka inadvertently illustrated a different species. Ŋe selected lectotype (designated here) is the best-preserved of the syntypes and is depicted as Figure 5 A herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FFC7FF34FCA8FEC6.taxon	description	DESCRIPTION Colony erect, bilamellar, flat, autozooecia opening on both faces. Autozooecia of similar shape to S. subovata n. comb., with combined peristomial aperture / suboral avicularium complex proportionately larger, occupying a considerable part of frontal surface. Frontal shield smooth, imperforate except for small, sparse, areolar-septular pores in the margins typically paired proximally. Secondary calcification increases convexity of frontal shield. Two areolar-septular pores situated on the proximal margin of the autozooecia, sometimes indistinct. ‘ Primary aperture’ deeply immersed beneath peristomial aperture, the rim of which embraces the suboral avicularium so that the paired spiramina and broken avicularian chamber often appear as three holes of equivalent size. Median process separating spiramina shorter than in S. subovata n. comb. Oral spines absent. Suboral avicularium circular, with no trace of crossbar remaining in any zooecium. Ooecium deeply immersed, recumbent on distal zooecium, ectooecium imperforate, typically mostly concealed by secondary calcification. Adventitious avicularia rare on frontal shield, large, with long rostrum tapering laterally. Vicarious avicularia situated on the margin of colony, as large as autozooecium, with rounder rostrum and drop-like aperture.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE3FFC7FF34FCA8FEC6.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe type material examined cannot be fractured and the interior of the frontal shield and aperture have not been observed. From frontal view we infer that the construction of the spiraminal complex is similar to that in S. subovata n. comb. Stoliczkella crenatula n. comb. differs from S. subovata n. comb. in having shorter autozooecia, smaller suboral avicularia and larger adventitious avicularia with a pointed rostrum.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE1FD57F9C9FD5FFE86.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0051.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE1FD57F9C9FD5FFE86.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony encrusting, the fragment comprising three short rows of autozooecia, these rhomboidal to oval with about 30 very small marginal areolar-septular pores. Frontal shield prominent, convex, smooth or slightly granular, with a small umbo. Aperture oval with a shallow lyrula and usually 5 - 7 oral-spine bases around periphery. Ooecium small, globular, recumbent on distal zooecium; ooecial aperture not preserved.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1607FFE1FD57F9C9FD5FFE86.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Escharella grotriani differs from Escharella tenera (Reuss, 1874) in having a small umbo on the frontal shield, 5 - 7 oral spines and broad, rhomboidal autozooecia. Zágoršek (2003) presented a detailed discussion of the generic attribution of this species.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFE1FFCFFE36FC0EFEC6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype, registered as 1859 / 0026 / 0133.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFE1FFCFFE36FC0EFEC6.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony multiserial, erect with circular cross section. Branch fragment comprising fewer than 20 autozooecia, these trapezoidal, with densely pseudoporous frontal shields bordered by smooth interzooidal boundaries that represent frontally eroded adjacent zooecial margins. Apertures large, more or less cleithridiate with wedge-shaped sinus delimited by prominent condyles. No avicularia or ooecia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFE1FFCFFE36FC0EFEC6.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe smooth interzooecial boundaries and cleithridiate orifice are distinctive features of this species. Ŋe generic attribution is uncertain in the absence of ovicells and avicularia. Ŋe apertural shape most resembles that seen in Myriapora, a genus confined to Mediterranean and Arctic-Boreal waters, whose species, however, do not normally have such distinct interzooecial boundaries. A species with similarlooking zooecia is Myriapora kuhni Vávra, 2011, from the Oligocene of Germany; it is encrusting, however, and the visible autozooecial boundaries do not form such a wide outline. On the other hand, the colonial and zooecial morphology of Stoliczka’s species match that found in Opphiphorina Gordon & d’Hondt, 1997 (Phorioppniidae), a monotypic genus known only from New Caledonia and the Kermadec Islands in the Southwest Pacific. Oppiphorina epaxia (Gordon, 1984) has somewhat cleidridiate apertures (with a broader sinus, however) and densely perforated zooecia with raised margins that, if eroded, would present exactly the smooth interzooecial boundaries seen in C. beyrichi. Similar margins are seen in confamilial Phorioppnia Gordon & d’Hondt, 1997 from New Caledonia, which, however, has non-cleithridiate apertures and dimorphic female orifices. Only the finding of ovicells in Stoliczka’s species will settle the matter.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFFFFC83FE17FF26FEA5.taxon	description	(Milne Edwards, 1836) (Fig. 6 I, J)	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFFFFC83FE17FF26FEA5.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Ŋree syntypes of Eschara porulosa, registered as 2010 / 0259 / 0009. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 3, fig. 3) and is depicted as Figure 6 I herein.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFFFFC83FE17FF26FEA5.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Colony large, bilamellar, with lensoidal cross section and well-developed median lamella. Autozooecia hexagonal to circular, arranged in c. 12 - 15 longitudinal series around branch. Each autozooecium comprising two regions of about equal length, a distal peristomial part and a proximofrontal part, the former strongly convex, sometimes hexagonal, the latter weakly convex, not clearly delimited from that neighbours, the frontal shield coarsely pseudoporous. Aperture circular to oval, surrounded by thick, low peristome. Ascopore of similar size to pseudopores, situated in distal half of autozooecia. Ooecia and avicularia lacking.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC1605FFFFFC83FE17FF26FEA5.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Ŋe separation of autozooecia into two parts as described by Zágoršek (2003) and also illustrated by Bock (2013 a) is not evident in the syntype specimens (the thin threads of calcification normally separating these parts are not observable). Other features, however (flat colonies, presence of median lamella and ascopore situated in the distal half of the autozooecium), clearly identify this species. Tubucella mammillaris differs from Tubucella papillosa (Reuss, 1848) in having flatter branch profiles (T. papillosa has more-rounded branches), shorter autozooecia (more elongate in T. papil- losa) and the ascopore situated closer to the aperture (near the centre of the frontal shield in T. papillosa).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFFFF70FE36FE13FB9D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Holotype of Retepora fasciata, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0044.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFFFF70FE36FE13FB9D.taxon	diagnosis	DIAGNOSIS. — Poorly preserved small fragment of branch with zooecia arranged in two longitudinal rows on one side only. Autozooecia elongate, lacking clear boundaries. Apertural characters weakly defined, possibly including a suboral spiramen or broken avicularian chamber. No frontal avicularia or ooecia observed.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFFFF70FE36FE13FB9D.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Owing to the very poor preservation of the specimen, with weakly defined autozooecia and no obvious avicularia and ovicells, this species must be regarded as a nomen dubium.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFAFD41F9E9FDA6FBBE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Nine syntypes, registered as 1862 / 0022 / 0046. Ŋe chosen lectotype (designated here) corresponds with Stoliczka’s illustration (1862: pl. 2, fig. 6) and is depicted as Figure 8 A herein. Ŋe species has been illustrated by Gordon on http: // bryozoa. net / cheilostomata / orbituliporidae / sticreu. html (last access 1 st December 2014).	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFAFD41F9E9FDA6FBBE.taxon	materials_examined	DESCRIPTION	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFAFD41F9E9FDA6FBBE.taxon	description	Colony discoidal, free-living, with a circular central kenozooidal pit on frontal face and having a concave obverse face. Autozooecia oval to regularly hexagonal with convex frontal shield on upper face of colony; hexagonal with a slightly porous basal wall on lower face; aperture more or less central in zooecium, elongate-oval / subpyriform with short condyles sometimes in evidence. In cross section, autozooecia bottle shaped, with slightly curved distal part. Small kenozooecia with tiny central foramen scattered among autozooecia on upper face. Avicularium usually not present. Ooecia situated on margin of colony, globular with imperforate frontal skeletal wall, slightly immersed in distal autozooecia.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
926087BC161BFFFAFD41F9E9FDA6FBBE.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Stichoporina reussi Stoliczka, 1862 has no avicularia, whereas Stichoporina simplex Koschinsky, 1885 and Stichoporina protecta Koschinsky, 1885 have them. Stichoporina reussi is the type species of the genus, which has been synonymised by Braga (1980) and many other authors with Stenosipora Canu & Bassler, 1927 (type species Stichoporina protecta). Stenosipora, however, has avicularia, lacks a central pit and basal kenozooecia, and does not form evenly circular colonies. We accept both genera as valid.	en	Zágoršek, Kamil, Gordon, Dennis P. (2014): Revision of the Oligocene bryozoan taxa described by Stoliczka (1862), with the description of a new genus of Bryocryptellidae. Geodiversitas 36 (4): 541-564, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/g2014n4a3
