taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03DA87A1FF819C4BFD3591D8FE61FB39.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF869C4BFF78915FFEB8F975.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF869C4BFCFF97E3FC62FA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF869C4AFD309199FE21FCDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF879C4AFEC097E2FE07FA34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF879C4AFEC09259FCB9FAB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF879C48FD099198FD82FE41.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF859C48FF6E95A6FDF5FBB8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF859C48FF77917FFBFBFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF859C48FC9195E6FB88FB19.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF859C47FC92917FFDEFFABC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538024/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538024	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 4. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from the sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. squinaboli Pes- sagno,1976 (H2O2 method);B, Archaeodictyomitra cf. A. lamellicostata (Foreman, 1968) (H2O2 method); C, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 1 (H2O2 method); D, Archaeodictyomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); E, Dictyomitra sp. 1 (H2O2 method); F, Dictyomitra sp. 2 (H2O2 method); G, Mita regina? (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (CH3COOH method); H, Amphipyndax tylotus Foreman, 1978 (H2O2 method); I, Stichomitra asymbatos Foreman,1968 (H2O2 method);J, Stichomitra? sp.1 (H2O2 method); K, Stichomitra? sp. 2 (H2O2 method); L, Rhopalosyrin- gium magnificum Campbell & Clark,1944 (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF859C47FC92917FFDEFFABC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8A9C47FF589278FC7DFC9C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8A9C47FCD7905CFC6BF972.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8B9C46FCBA9620FB58FBF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8B9C46FF1D917EFC8AFEA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8B9C46FECA9505FE20FBF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF8B9C44FC81917FFDEAFF23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF899C44FEE79259FBB7FC9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF899C44FF059545FDC4FCFD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF899C44FF039702FF0AFA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF899C44FC819702FB8BFA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
03DA87A1FF899C43FCC99259FEBDFDBF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4538026/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538026	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	FIG. 5. — SEM images of Radiolaria recovered from sample 999B/60/2W/70-74 cm: A, Rhopalosyringium kleinum Empson-Morin, 1981 (H2O2 method); B, Botryometra heros (Campbell & Clark, 1944) (H2O2 method); C, Cryptamphorella sp. (H2O2 method); D, Theocapsomma sp. (Empson-Morin, 1981) (CH3COOH method); E, Praeconocaryomma californiaensis Pessagno, 1976 (H2O2 method); F, Alievium? sp. (H2O2 method); G, Paronaella? sp. (H2O2 method); H, Orbiculiforma sp. 1 (H2O2 method); I, Orbiculifor- ma sp. 2 (CH3COOH method); J, Crucella sp. (H2O2 method); K, Tholodiscus sp. (H2O2 method); L, Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet. (H2O2 method). The chemical compound after each species indicates the chemical method applied in the recovery of each figured specimen. Scale bars: 100 µm.	2013-03-29	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson		Zenodo	biologists	Kochhann, Karlos G. D.;Baecker-Fauth, Simone;Fauth, Gerson			
