identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
C3023753FFBDF73AACD727B8FA4EE5CB.text	C3023753FFBDF73AACD727B8FA4EE5CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrmecotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge 1894	<div><p>Genus Myrmecotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894</p> <p>Type species: Myrmecotypus fuliginosus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 (by original designation)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Cephalic region wide (cephalic index range 64–89), carapace narrowed (carapace index ˂ 60), without thoracic groove but with slight depression instead; PER wider than AER and almost straight to moderately recurved, AME larger than ALE, PME–PME greater than PME–PLE, PLE situated close to lateral margin of cephalic area; abdomen only very slightly petiolated; tibia I ventral spines paired in 2–2, 3–2, 3–3 or 4–4 arrangement; trochanter IV notch usually absent, with only a tiny one, if present (Perger &amp; Rubio 2020a, 2021).</p> <p>Key to the known Bolivian species of Myrmecotypus</p> <p>1. Tibia I spination 3-3 or 5-5.............................................................................. 2</p> <p>- Tibia I spination 4-4............................................................... M. niger Chickering, 1937</p> <p>2. Carapace with shallow transverse constriction...............................................................3</p> <p>- Carapace with deep transverse constriction................................... M. tahyinandu Perger &amp; Rubio, 2020</p> <p>3. Males.............................................................................................. 5</p> <p>4. Females............................................................................................. 7</p> <p>5. Embolus with at least one tegular projection near base........................................................ 6</p> <p>- Embolus without tegular projection, twisted....................................... M. iguazu Rubio &amp; Arbino, 2009</p> <p>6. Embolus slightly curved................................................ M. rubrofemoratus Perger &amp; Rubio, 2021</p> <p>- Embolus cat claw-shaped................................................................ M. haddadi sp. nov.</p> <p>7. Epigyne openings rounded.............................................................................. 8</p> <p>- Epigyne openings narrow, transverse............................................. M. iguazu Rubio &amp; Arbino, 2009</p> <p>8. Epigyne openings distal to spermathecae................................... M. rubrofemoratus Perger &amp; Rubio, 2021</p> <p>- Epigyne openings mediolateral to spermathecae.............................................. M. haddadi sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/C3023753FFBDF73AACD727B8FA4EE5CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Perger, Robert;Rubio, Gonzalo D.	Perger, Robert, Rubio, Gonzalo D. (2021): Myrmecotypus haddadi sp. nov. - a new species of ant resembling sac spider from the Bolivian orocline (Araneae: Corinnidae: Castianeirinae). Zootaxa 4969 (1): 54-60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4969.1.2
C3023753FFBEF73DACD7241EFBA0E198.text	C3023753FFBEF73DACD7241EFBA0E198.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Myrmecotypus haddadi Perger & Rubio 2021	<div><p>Myrmecotypus haddadi sp. nov.</p> <p>(LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 16B033D9-2AC3-415D-8741-B32C349CF7F0)</p> <p>Figs 2, 3, 4.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂ from BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz department, Santa Cruz de la Colina, Urubo (-17.760833°; -63.24°), 432 m a.s.l., 21 Dec 2019, leg. R. Perger, Cerrado-like grassland adjacent to fragment of Chiquitano forest (ZMH-A0015356). Paratypes: 1 ♂, same data as holotype (ZMH-A0015357). 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Santa Maria la Antigua (- 17.3719°; -63.6563°), Cerradao, ~ 30 m away from Cerrado savanna, 13 Apr 2018, leg. R. Perger (IBSI-Ara1463).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, haddadi, is a patronym in honour of Charles R. Haddad in recognition of his contributions to the taxonomy of Castianeirinae.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Judging from the light coxa II and the remainder of coxae dark (Figs 2; 4B), the tibia I ventral spination 3-3 and the male genital bulb with two loops lateral to main sperm duct (Fig. 3 A-C), the species is most closely related to M. iguazu Rubio &amp; Arbino, 2009, M. rubrofemoratus Perger &amp; Rubio, 2021 and M. tahyinandu Perger &amp; Rubio, 2020 (this combination of characters is not found in other congeners). Myrmecotypus haddadi sp. nov. can be separated from these species by a broader carapace in relation to the carapace length (carapace index of 57 in male and 54 in female) and the cephalic width (cephalic index of 67 in male and 70 in female) (Figs 2A, 4A, C); embolus of male palp cat claw-shaped, forming beak-like structure with a spatula-shaped tegular projection (coupling piece) (Fig. 3A, B), epigyne with two widely separated, rounded genital openings mediolateral to spermathecae (Fig. 3D, E) (see Tab. 1 for comparisons).</p> <p>Remarks. Rubio &amp; Arbino (2009) and Perger &amp; Rubio (2020a) hypothesized that some Neotropical species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 may belong to Myrmecotypus. Amongst those species, A. formicoides Mello-Leitão, 1939, is the only with a sub-globose abdomen and light coxa II (the remainder of coxae dark) (Mello-Leitão 1939). This species can be distinguished from M. haddadi sp. nov. by a carapace index of 41 and the distance between the inner margins of the PLE being as wide as the maximum width of the AER (Mello-Leitão 1939) (wider in the new species).</p> <p>Description of male holotype. Body length 5.23; carapace length 2.79, width 1.58, carapace index 57; cephalic width 1.09, cephalic index 67; sternum length 1.28, width 0.93, sternum index 72; abdomen length 2.21, width 1.62, abdominal index 73; petiole length 0.09, width 0.38; dorsal sclerite length 2.21, width 1.62; epigastric sclerite length 0.63, width 1.07; ventral sclerite length 0.95, width 0.73; inframamillary sclerite length 0.23, width 0.56. AER 0.64; AME–AME 0.09; AME–ALE 0.04; PER 0.91; PME–PME 0.24; PME–PLE 0.17.</p> <p>Carapace (Fig. 2A, C). Obovate, squarely truncated anteriorly, front slightly convex, cephalic region narrowed, laterally slightly concave, thoracic region distinctly broadening in middle, evenly narrowing in posterior direction, posterior margin straight; slight constriction between cephalic and thoracic regions and posterior region strongly convex when viewed laterally. Dorsum weakly shiny, smooth, dark brown; setae short, appressed, white, simple, relatively dense laterally between cephalic and thoracic regions but not obscuring integument (setae mostly abraded after storage in ethanol).</p> <p>Eyes. Eight eyes in two rows; both slightly recurved, diameter of AME about 30% larger than that of other eyes.</p> <p>Chelicerae. Orange brown, shiny, glabrous, area between retro- and promarginal rows of cheliceral teeth orange white with dense white hairs, 2 retro- and 2 promarginal teeth.</p> <p>Abdomen. Short oval; anterior margin of petiole straight; dorsal sclerite completely covering abdomen dorsally and laterally; ventral sclerite fully developed, covering area between ventro-lateral margins of dorsal scutum and between epigastric and inframamillary sclerites; inframamillary sclerite narrow, subrectangular. Dorsum weakly shiny, smooth, dark brown; abdominal setae long, simple, not sclerotized to spines, dark; simple, short, white setae on abdomen; transverse band of feathery setae in middle; separate, long, erected white setae on posterior part (most setae strongly abraded).</p> <p>Legs. Coxa II translucent white, remainder of coxae dark brown, trochanters I-IV whitish-yellow; femora I and II translucent white, broad black bands along edges, remainder of leg I and II yellow; femora and tibiae III and IV dark brown, edges lined with bands of short, appressed, white feathery setae, base patella IV translucent white ventrally, metatarsi and tarsi III and IV light brown.</p> <p>Palp. Margin of pedipalp tibia continuous; tarsus with relatively broad genital bulb drawn out into broad neck, embolus cat claw-shaped, not twisted, forming beak-like structure with spatula-shaped tegular projection (coupling projection) (Fig. 3A, B); sperm ducts with two loops, both lateral and basal to embolus tube (Fig. 3A, B).</p> <p>Female paratype. Body length 4.4; carapace length 2.16, width 1.16; carapace index 53.7; cephalic width 0.81, cephalic index 70; sternum length 0.87, width 0.62, sternum index 71.3; abdomen length 2.12, width 1.59, abdominal index 75; petiole length 0.2; dorsal sclerite length 1.5, width 1.52; epigastric sclerite length 0.55, width 0.9; inframamillary sclerite length 0.2; width 0.4. AER 0.48; AME–AME 0.06; AME–ALE 0.02. PER 0.7; PME– PME 0.2; PME–PLE 0.12.</p> <p>Posterior part of carapace slightly convex when seen in lateral view (Fig. 4B), dorsal sclerite shorter than in male (Fig. 4B), 70% of abdomen length, posterior border slightly convex, ventral sclerite absent; remaining somatic characters as in male.</p> <p>Epigyne. With two widely separated, rounded genital openings mediolateral to spermathecae; two slight pouches (or furrows) posterior to each opening (maybe for fitting of male palpal projection) (Fig. 3D); separation between primary and secondary spermathecae slightly visible, primary and secondary spermathecae forming eggplantshaped spermathecae (Fig. 3E), copulatory ducts short, at level of copulatory openings, entering the spermathecae posteriorly.</p> <p>Variation. There was no visible intra-specific variation, except for that inherent in the gender dimorphism.</p> <p>Geographical and ecological distribution. This species is only known from the localities in Urubo and Santa Maria la Antigua, Santa Cruz department, Bolivia. In both localities, specimens were collected from low herbaceous plants in Cerrado-like vegetation along edges of Chiquitano and Cerradao forest (Fig. 1). In Urubo, M. haddadi sp. nov. was observed co-occurring with the Castianeirinae species Mazax cf. ramirezi Rubio &amp; Danişman, 2014. Despite high sampling effort in several Bolivian forest ecoregions (Perger &amp; Perger 2017; Perger &amp; Rubio 2018, 2020a, b, 2021), the new species was not observed in forest habitats.</p> <p>Ant mimicry. In the other Bolivian species of Myrmecotypus, the color of body parts and the color and distribution of setae increases the resemblance to specific ant models of the tribes Camponotini or Dolichoderini (Perger &amp; Rubio 2020a, 2021). Unfortunately, the life habitus of the new species was not documented and the loss of setae due to the storage in ethanol hampered the assessment of mimetic relationships. However, as in the other congeners, the body size, obovate carapace and short oval abdomen mostly resemble ants of Camponotini or Dolichoderini. Additional field observations are needed to identify potential ant models.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/C3023753FFBEF73DACD7241EFBA0E198	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Perger, Robert;Rubio, Gonzalo D.	Perger, Robert, Rubio, Gonzalo D. (2021): Myrmecotypus haddadi sp. nov. - a new species of ant resembling sac spider from the Bolivian orocline (Araneae: Corinnidae: Castianeirinae). Zootaxa 4969 (1): 54-60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4969.1.2
