taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770473/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770473	Fig. 1. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991 (Algeria, Ain-Kemellal; MIZ), SEM micrographs. A−G. ♀. H−K. ♂. A. Habitus, lateroventral view. B. Last two urosomal somites, ventral view – note the integumental ornamentation of shallow pits. C. Caudal rami, ventral view. D. Rostrum area of the cephalothorax and first antennulary segments. E. Maxillulary palp. F. Leg 1, frontal view. G. Leg 5 and leg 6. H. Habitus, ventral view. I. Caudal rami, ventral view – note the lack of ʻSerraʼ on the lateral margin. J. Antennule, modified setae indicated by arrows on segments 4 and 5. K. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. A–B, E show ♀-2; C–D, F show ♀-1; G shows ♀-3; H–I show ♂-2; J shows ♂-1; K shows ♂-3. Scale bars: A, H = 200 μm; B−G, I−K = 20 μm.	Fig. 1. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991 (Algeria, Ain-Kemellal; MIZ), SEM micrographs. A−G. ♀. H−K. ♂. A. Habitus, lateroventral view. B. Last two urosomal somites, ventral view – note the integumental ornamentation of shallow pits. C. Caudal rami, ventral view. D. Rostrum area of the cephalothorax and first antennulary segments. E. Maxillulary palp. F. Leg 1, frontal view. G. Leg 5 and leg 6. H. Habitus, ventral view. I. Caudal rami, ventral view – note the lack of ʻSerraʼ on the lateral margin. J. Antennule, modified setae indicated by arrows on segments 4 and 5. K. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. A–B, E show ♀-2; C–D, F show ♀-1; G shows ♀-3; H–I show ♂-2; J shows ♂-1; K shows ♂-3. Scale bars: A, H = 200 μm; B−G, I−K = 20 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770481/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770481	Fig. 2. Eucyclops azorensisDefaye & Dussart, 1991, ♀ (Azores, paratypes; MNHN Cp. 611). A. Pediger 4, lateral section, dorsal view. B. Antennulary segments 8−10, dorsal surface − note short aesthetasc on segment 9. C. Antennal coxobasis and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note the suture line between basipodite and coxopodite. D. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. E. Mandible. F. Maxillule. A, C−F show ♀-1; B shows ♀-2. Scale bars: A−F = 50 μm.	Fig. 2. Eucyclops azorensisDefaye & Dussart, 1991, ♀ (Azores, paratypes; MNHN Cp. 611). A. Pediger 4, lateral section, dorsal view. B. Antennulary segments 8−10, dorsal surface − note short aesthetasc on segment 9. C. Antennal coxobasis and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note the suture line between basipodite and coxopodite. D. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. E. Mandible. F. Maxillule. A, C−F show ♀-1; B shows ♀-2. Scale bars: A−F = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770485/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770485	Fig. 3. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991, ♀ (Algeria, Ain-Kemellal; MIZ). A. Pediger 4 dorsal surface − note hairs at posterolateral angle. B. Antennal coxobasis, caudal view (inner medial seta broken). C. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. D. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view. E. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view, (tips of some terminal setae were broken, seta length was reconstructed based on setae on the other side). F. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view – note thickened cuticle in inner proximal margin of second endopodite (arrow). A shows MIZ 1/2021/11; B−F show MIZ 1/2021/10. Scale bars: A−F = 50 μm.	Fig. 3. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991, ♀ (Algeria, Ain-Kemellal; MIZ). A. Pediger 4 dorsal surface − note hairs at posterolateral angle. B. Antennal coxobasis, caudal view (inner medial seta broken). C. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. D. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view. E. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view, (tips of some terminal setae were broken, seta length was reconstructed based on setae on the other side). F. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view – note thickened cuticle in inner proximal margin of second endopodite (arrow). A shows MIZ 1/2021/11; B−F show MIZ 1/2021/10. Scale bars: A−F = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770491/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770491	Fig. 4. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991 (Azores, paratypes; MNHN Cp. 611). A−C. ♀. D−G. ♂. A. Leg 1, frontal view − medial seta of basipodite is figured separately. B. Leg 1 intercoxal sclerite, frontal view. C. Leg 4, protopodite and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note thickened cuticle in inner proximal margin of second endopodite (arrow). D. First antennulary segment with two modified brush setae (arrows) and one aesthetasc (shaded), ventral view. E. Antennal coxobasis, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. G. Leg 4, caudal view. A shows ♀-2; B−C show ♀-1; D−G show ♂-1. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	Fig. 4. Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991 (Azores, paratypes; MNHN Cp. 611). A−C. ♀. D−G. ♂. A. Leg 1, frontal view − medial seta of basipodite is figured separately. B. Leg 1 intercoxal sclerite, frontal view. C. Leg 4, protopodite and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note thickened cuticle in inner proximal margin of second endopodite (arrow). D. First antennulary segment with two modified brush setae (arrows) and one aesthetasc (shaded), ventral view. E. Antennal coxobasis, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. G. Leg 4, caudal view. A shows ♀-2; B−C show ♀-1; D−G show ♂-1. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770497/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770497	Fig. 5. Geographic distribution of Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991. Filled black circles show occurrences verified by the authors, and open circles show records taken from literature (Defaye & Dussart 1991; Ghaouaci et al. 2017; Ghaouaci 2018).	Fig. 5. Geographic distribution of Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991. Filled black circles show occurrences verified by the authors, and open circles show records taken from literature (Defaye & Dussart 1991; Ghaouaci et al. 2017; Ghaouaci 2018).	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770501/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770501	Fig. 6. Habitat variation in Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991. A−D. Madeira, Portugal. E. Tébessa, Algeria. A. Ribeiro de Frio, flowing water. B. Seminatural freshwater pond. C. Ribeira de São João, nearly standing water. D. Ribeira de Machico, flowing water. E. Brackish pond at Ain Kemellal.	Fig. 6. Habitat variation in Eucyclops azorensis Defaye & Dussart, 1991. A−D. Madeira, Portugal. E. Tébessa, Algeria. A. Ribeiro de Frio, flowing water. B. Seminatural freshwater pond. C. Ribeira de São João, nearly standing water. D. Ribeira de Machico, flowing water. E. Brackish pond at Ain Kemellal.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770506/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770506	Fig. 8. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Pediger 4, dorsal view. B. Pediger 5 and genital double-somite (leg 5 is not figured), ventral view. C. Leg 5. D. Anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal view. E. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. G. Labrum – ʻepiʼ shows epistoma, laterodistal lobe is indicated by arrow. H. Paragnaths, ventral view (3+1 medial claws inserted on opposite surface of both paragnaths are not figured). A, D−H show ♀-1; B−C show ♀-2. Scale bars: A−H = 50 μm.	Fig. 8. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Pediger 4, dorsal view. B. Pediger 5 and genital double-somite (leg 5 is not figured), ventral view. C. Leg 5. D. Anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal view. E. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. G. Labrum – ʻepiʼ shows epistoma, laterodistal lobe is indicated by arrow. H. Paragnaths, ventral view (3+1 medial claws inserted on opposite surface of both paragnaths are not figured). A, D−H show ♀-1; B−C show ♀-2. Scale bars: A−H = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD9253BF38A959A45CD1EEF86F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770509/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770509	Fig. 9. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Mandible, anterior view.B−C. Variation of the spinule ornamentation of the maxillulary palp. B. ♀-1 (one apical seta is broken off). C. ♀-3. D. Maxillar basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, caudal view. E. Maxillar syncoxopodite, caudal view – note short transverse row of spinules near lateral margin (arrow). F. Maxilliped, basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, frontal view. G. Maxilliped, syncoxopodite and basipodite, frontal view – note the flap-like structure (arrow). H. Leg 1, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, frontal view (coxopodal seta is figured separately). I. Leg 1, second and third exopodal segments, frontal view. J. Leg 1, second and third endopodal segments, frontal view. A shows ♀-2; B, D–E, G−J show ♀-1; C, F show ♀-3. Scale bars: A−J = 50 μm.	Fig. 9. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Mandible, anterior view.B−C. Variation of the spinule ornamentation of the maxillulary palp. B. ♀-1 (one apical seta is broken off). C. ♀-3. D. Maxillar basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, caudal view. E. Maxillar syncoxopodite, caudal view – note short transverse row of spinules near lateral margin (arrow). F. Maxilliped, basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, frontal view. G. Maxilliped, syncoxopodite and basipodite, frontal view – note the flap-like structure (arrow). H. Leg 1, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, frontal view (coxopodal seta is figured separately). I. Leg 1, second and third exopodal segments, frontal view. J. Leg 1, second and third endopodal segments, frontal view. A shows ♀-2; B, D–E, G−J show ♀-1; C, F show ♀-3. Scale bars: A−J = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD925EBF23A960A736D151FE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770503/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770503	Fig. 7.Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars, 1909) (Lake Victoria, paratype, ♀; NHM). A. Antennulary segment 9−12, ventral surface (terminal setae of segment 12 are not figured). B. Antennal coxobasis and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note the group of spinules next to distal margin (arrow). C. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. D. Mandible (Md) and maxillule (Mxl). E. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view. F. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view. G. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	Fig. 7.Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars, 1909) (Lake Victoria, paratype, ♀; NHM). A. Antennulary segment 9−12, ventral surface (terminal setae of segment 12 are not figured). B. Antennal coxobasis and first and second endopodal segments, caudal view – note the group of spinules next to distal margin (arrow). C. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, frontal view. D. Mandible (Md) and maxillule (Mxl). E. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view. F. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view. G. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD925EBF23A960A736D151FE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770506/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770506	Fig. 8. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Pediger 4, dorsal view. B. Pediger 5 and genital double-somite (leg 5 is not figured), ventral view. C. Leg 5. D. Anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal view. E. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. G. Labrum – ʻepiʼ shows epistoma, laterodistal lobe is indicated by arrow. H. Paragnaths, ventral view (3+1 medial claws inserted on opposite surface of both paragnaths are not figured). A, D−H show ♀-1; B−C show ♀-2. Scale bars: A−H = 50 μm.	Fig. 8. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Pediger 4, dorsal view. B. Pediger 5 and genital double-somite (leg 5 is not figured), ventral view. C. Leg 5. D. Anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal view. E. Antennal coxobasis and first endopodal segment, caudal view. F. Antennal coxobasis, frontal view. G. Labrum – ʻepiʼ shows epistoma, laterodistal lobe is indicated by arrow. H. Paragnaths, ventral view (3+1 medial claws inserted on opposite surface of both paragnaths are not figured). A, D−H show ♀-1; B−C show ♀-2. Scale bars: A−H = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD925EBF23A960A736D151FE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770509/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770509	Fig. 9. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Mandible, anterior view.B−C. Variation of the spinule ornamentation of the maxillulary palp. B. ♀-1 (one apical seta is broken off). C. ♀-3. D. Maxillar basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, caudal view. E. Maxillar syncoxopodite, caudal view – note short transverse row of spinules near lateral margin (arrow). F. Maxilliped, basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, frontal view. G. Maxilliped, syncoxopodite and basipodite, frontal view – note the flap-like structure (arrow). H. Leg 1, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, frontal view (coxopodal seta is figured separately). I. Leg 1, second and third exopodal segments, frontal view. J. Leg 1, second and third endopodal segments, frontal view. A shows ♀-2; B, D–E, G−J show ♀-1; C, F show ♀-3. Scale bars: A−J = 50 μm.	Fig. 9. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Mandible, anterior view.B−C. Variation of the spinule ornamentation of the maxillulary palp. B. ♀-1 (one apical seta is broken off). C. ♀-3. D. Maxillar basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, caudal view. E. Maxillar syncoxopodite, caudal view – note short transverse row of spinules near lateral margin (arrow). F. Maxilliped, basipodite and two-segmented endopodite, frontal view. G. Maxilliped, syncoxopodite and basipodite, frontal view – note the flap-like structure (arrow). H. Leg 1, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, frontal view (coxopodal seta is figured separately). I. Leg 1, second and third exopodal segments, frontal view. J. Leg 1, second and third endopodal segments, frontal view. A shows ♀-2; B, D–E, G−J show ♀-1; C, F show ♀-3. Scale bars: A−J = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD925EBF23A960A736D151FE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770513/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770513	Fig. 10. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Leg 2 exopodite, caudal view. B. Leg 2 intercoxal sclerite, caudal view – ornamentation on the frontal surface is indicated by dotted line. C. Leg 3 exopodite, caudal view. D. Leg 3 intercoxal sclerite, caudal view − ornamentation on the frontal surface is indicated by dotted line. E. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view (coxal seta is figured separately). F. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view. G. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view. All drawings show ♀-1. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	Fig. 10. Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909), ♀ (Lake Tanganyika, Kirando; NHM). A. Leg 2 exopodite, caudal view. B. Leg 2 intercoxal sclerite, caudal view – ornamentation on the frontal surface is indicated by dotted line. C. Leg 3 exopodite, caudal view. D. Leg 3 intercoxal sclerite, caudal view − ornamentation on the frontal surface is indicated by dotted line. E. Leg 4, protopodite and first exopodal and endopodal segments, caudal view (coxal seta is figured separately). F. Leg 4, second and third exopodal segments, caudal view. G. Leg 4, second and third endopodal segments, caudal view. All drawings show ♀-1. Scale bars: A−G = 50 μm.	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
03BC87DD925EBF23A960A736D151FE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4770517/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770517	Fig. 11. Verified records of Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909). Filled red circles show occurrences verified by the authors, and open circle shows a record taken from the original description of the species (Sars 1909).	Fig. 11. Verified records of Eucyclops agiloides (G.O. Sars,1909). Filled red circles show occurrences verified by the authors, and open circle shows a record taken from the original description of the species (Sars 1909).	2021-05-13	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia		Zenodo	biologists	Hołyńska, Maria;Sługocki, Łukasz;Ghaouaci, Souad;Amarouayache, Mounia			
