taxonID	type	description	language	source
54215D78064CD4946C3096D5068F8A58.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Orthopagus can be distinguished from other genera in the Orthopagini by the following combination of characters: cephalic process short, truncated in front in dorsal view; vertex with lateral carinae strongly ridged and sub-parallel in basal half, slightly constricted at an terior margin of eyes, median carina sharp and complete; frons with intermediate carinae approaching frontoclypeal suture, median carina complete; pronotum with intermediate carinae distinct in basal half; mesonotum with lateral carinae curving anteriad towards median carina; forewings with a wide sublunate streak on distal half of wing, transverse veins sparse, pterostigmal area with 2 - 4 cells; fore femora flattened and dilated, with a large and blunt spine near apex; hind tibiae with seven apical teeth; phallobase with inflated membranous paired lobes, with or without numerous small superficial spines.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
54215D78064CD4946C3096D5068F8A58.taxon	description	Description. Adult. General colour of body brownish ochraceous to dark brown marbled, with pale green and reddish ochraceous streaks on dorsum (Figs 1 A-B, 2 A-L). Females distinctly darker than males. Head pale ochraceous with dark brown markings on vertex and frons the extent of which varies among species. Clypeus pale ochraceous basally, with two small dark spots at frontoclypeal suture on each side of median carina, apical half dark brown. Pronotum brownish ochraceous to dark brown, median carina and spots on lateral marginal areas and paranotal lobes pale ochraceous. Mesonotum dark brown, median and lateral carinae, and lateral marginal areas flavescent or greenish. Forewing veins light ochraceous, membrane hyaline to translucent with three dark brown markings: (i) a large sublunate streak extending along the posterio-apical margin from basal portion of areola postica across apical portions of cells of the medial area to the apex of RP vein; (ii) triangular patch on pterostigma, extending also into radial area (C 1 cell) and rarely more mesiad as a dark streak along nodal line; (iii) streak along postclaval wing margin filling out whole inner claval cell (Figs 2 A-L, 3 A-F). Hind wing veins ochraceous, membrane clear, with a more or less developed dark brown marking along the apical portion of CuA 1 vein. Legs pale to dark brown: femora dull ochraceous to fuscous, banded and marked with ivory white; fore and mid tibiae yellowish green to ochraceous with two dark brown transverse bands medially; hind tibiae yellowish green (pale ochraceous in old dry-mounted specimens), with base and apex including lateral and apical spines fuscous; fore and mid tarsi fuscous, hind tarsi ochraceous. Abdomen dorsally and ventrally ochraceous to dark brown, with dark brown or pale ochraceous spots and stripes of various sizes and shape. Head (Figs 4 A-C, 5 A-C, 6 A-C, 8 A-C, 9 A-C, 10 A-C) usually produced in a short and stout cephalic process. Vertex (Figs 4 A, 5 A, 6 A, 8 A, 9 A, 10 A) moderately broad, basal width slightly greater than transverse diameter of eyes in dorsal view, posterior plane elevated above pronotum; lateral carinae strongly ridged, foliaceous, and sub-parallel in basal half, slightly constricted at anterior margin of eyes, broadly convex at apex; posterior margin ridged, concave, forming angle of 80 - 90 °; median carina sharp and complete. Frons (Figs 4 C, 5 C, 6 C, 8 C, 9 C, 10 C) with lateral carinae ridged, nearly parallel, slightly expanded outward below antennae; intermediate carinae slightly converging posteriad and approaching frontoclypeal suture; median carina distinct and complete; basal margin of frons projecting anteriad of apex of vertex. Postclypeus and anteclypeus (Figs 4 C, 5 C, 6 C, 8 C, 9 C, 10 C) convex medially, with distinct median carina. Rostrum long, surpassing base of hind femora; basal segment nearly equal to distal one. Compound eyes large and globose. Ocelli relatively large, reddish. Antennae with very small scape; pedicel large and subglobular, with more than 50 distinct sensory plaque organs distributed over entire surface; flagellum long, setuliform. Pronotum (Figs 4 A, 5 A, 6 A, 8 A, 9 A, 10 A) distinctly shorter than mesonotum at midline, anterior margin angularly convex medially, lateral marginal areas straight and sloping down with two long longitudinal carinae on each side, posterior margin concave, forming obtuse angle (100 - 120 °); intermediate carinae distinct in basal half, strongly diverging laterad; median carina sharp and elevated, with a large lateral pit on each side. Mesonotum (Figs 4 A, 5 A, 6 A, 8 A, 9 A, 10 A) tricarinate on disc, lateral carinae converging anteriad towards median carina. Forewings (Fig. 3 A-F) hyaline, ratio of length to width about 3: 1; venation with sparse transverse veins; MP bifurcating MP 1 + 2 and MP 3 + 4 near middle and beyond CuA; number of apical cells between R and CuA equal to 14; Pcu and A 1 veins fused into a long Pcu + A 1 vein at apical 1 / 5 in clavus; pterostigmal area clear, with 2 - 4 cells. Legs moderately long; fore femora flattened and dilated, with a large and blunt spine near apex; hind tibiae with 5 - 7 (mostly six) lateral spines and seven apical teeth; hind tarsomeres I with 18 - 20 and tarsomeres II with 12 - 14 apical teeth, respectively. Male genitalia. Pygofer (Figs 4 D-F, 5 D-F, 6 D-F, 8 D-F, 9 D-F, 10 D-F) in lateral view distinctly wider ventrally than dorsally, dorsal margin slightly excavated to accommodate segment X, dorso-posterior margins angular, produced into a distinct lobe which is short and broad or larger and tooth-like. Gonostyles (Figs 4 E-F, 5 E-F, 6 E-F, 8 E-F, 9 G, 10 E-F) symmetrical, with narrow base, expanded toward apex, broadest at apical fourth; dorsal margin with a claw-like, apically sclerotised process directed dorsad, outer dorsal edge with a spiny hook-like sclerotised process near middle directed ventrad. Aedeagus (Figs 4 G-I, 5 G-I, 6 G-I, 8 G-I, 9 H-J, 10 G-I) with one pair of elongate endosomal processes extended from phallobase posteriad and strongly curved dorso-anteriad or laterad; these processes are membranous, acute apically and smooth or bearing numerous minute spines over their entire surface; phallobase sclerotised and pigmented basally, membranous and inflated apically, with paired lobes. Segment X (Figs 4 D-E, 5 D-E, 6 D-E, 8 D-E, 9 D-E, 10 D-E) large, in dorsal view with apex deeply excavated to accommodate anal style; anal style elongate and large. Female genitalia. Gonocoxae VIII (Fig. 7 D) with two membranous and flattened endogonocoxal processes (Gxp) on endogonocoxal lobe: Gxp 1 large and elongate, with a long sclerotized plate in it; Gxp 2 smaller and shorter. Gonapophyses VIII (Fig. 7 D) with anterior connective lamina large and sclerotized, with seven teeth of varying sizes and shapes. Gonapophyses IX (Fig. 7 E-F) with posterior connective lamina triangular, symmetrical, fused with intergonocoxal plate at base; intergonocoxal plate extended cephalad into genital cavity, forming wall of gonospiculum. Gonoplacs (Fig. 7 G) with two lobes homologous; lateral lobe large and moderately sclerotized, with long setae at apex; the posterior lobe membranous, containing long sclerotized plate. Segment X (Fig. 7 A) large and broad in dorsal view, apex deeply excavated to accommodate anal style; anal style large and elongate. Female ectodermal genital ducts ditrysian. Bursa copulatrix (Fig. 7 A-C) superficially membranous, regularly gridded, without sclerotized ornamentations. A pair of large digitiform glands (Fig. 7 B) branched at anterior extremity of the anterior vagina on each side of the spermatheca. Spermatheca (Fig. 7 B) divided clearly into five parts: orificium receptaculi, ductus receptaculi, diverticulum ductus, pars intermedialis, and glandula apicalis. Fifth instar nymph. See Yang and Yeh (1994) for a detailed description.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
54215D78064CD4946C3096D5068F8A58.taxon	distribution	Diversity and distribution. Orthopagus is revised here to include six valid species (see below). The species of the genus are widely distributed in the Oriental and eastern Palaearctic regions from India in the southwest to Japan in the northeast (Fig. 11).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
C6B12FD2C57E4B285F432B31F80B79E3.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Orthopagus bartletti sp. n. can be separated from all other Orthopagus species by the very short head, hardly produced in front of eyes; the forewings with a brownish streak along nodal line connecting the pterostigmal area with the distal sublunate streak; the dorso-posterior margin of the male pygofer with a large and broad process forming two distinct angles; the robust male segment X; and the lobes of the phallobase muricate apically.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
C6B12FD2C57E4B285F432B31F80B79E3.taxon	description	Description. Measurements (1 male). Body length (from apex of head to tip of forewings): 11.5 mm; head length (from apex of cephalic process to base of eyes): 1.2 mm; head width (including eyes): 1.5 mm; forewing length: 9.6 mm. Coloration (Fig. 2 A-B). General colour brownish ochraceous marked with dark brown on dorsum. Head greenish ochraceous, vertex with basal corners, a pair of round patches in basal third, and apical diamond-shaped spot dark brown (Fig. 4 A); frons with median area between intermediate carinae extensively dark brown anteriorly and with series of small pale fuscous spots along intermediate and lateral carinae and narrow ivory white band basally (Fig. 4 C). Clypeus ivory white, with two small spots at base and apex dark brown. Compound eyes fuscous with posterior margin ochraceous; ocelli purplish-red. Pronotum brownish ochraceous, median carina, apical marginal areas of ventral lobes, and posterior lateral angles ivory white. Mesonotum brownish ochraceous (Fig. 4 A). Forewings hyaline, veins ochraceous, pterostigmal area, a streak along nodal line, and a wide sublunate streak on distal third dull ochraceous; posterior (claval) margin broadly faintly brown (Fig. 3 A). Hind wings hyaline, veins and an apical spot dull ochraceous. Legs pale brown; fore femora subapically and hind tibiae at base and apex (including lateral and apical spines) blackish. Abdomen dorsally and ventrally brownish ochraceous. Structure. Head (Fig. 4 A-C) very short, cephalic process practically absent. Vertex (Fig. 4 A) with ratio of length at midline to width between eyes 1.4. Frons with base slightly inflated anteriad in dorsal view (Fig. 4 A), with transition to vertex broadly rounded in lateral view (Fig. 4 B); in ventral view, frons with ratio of length at midline to maximum width 2.2; median carina more or less obscure at base (Fig. 4 C). Male genitalia. Pygofer, in lateral view, with dorso-posterior margin forming a large, broad, biangular lobe (Fig. 4 E); in ventral view (Fig. 4 F) much longer than in dorsal view (Fig. 4 D) with ratio of ventral to dorsal width about 3.4. Gonostyles (Fig. 4 E, F) elongate, relatively narrow in basal half, with strongly sinuate dorsal margin medially. Aedeagus (Fig. 4 G-I) with endosomal processes relatively short and robust, without distinct minute superficial spines, and directed laterad; phallobase with a pair of large, elongate, thumb-like ventral lobes, curved dorso-posteriad and muricate apically (Fig. 4 G-H); and a pair of shorter lateral lobes, directed posteriad (Fig. 4 H). Segment X, in lateral view, relatively short and robust, with ventral margin gradually widening from base to broadly truncate apex (Fig. 4 E); in dorsal view broad, broadest medially, with ratio of length to maximum width 1.1 (Fig. 4 D). Female genitalia unknown.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
C6B12FD2C57E4B285F432B31F80B79E3.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named after Dr. Charles R. Bartlett, collector of the type specimen and curator of the insect collection at the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, USA, in recognition of his kindest help and support to the first author when he visited UDCC in 2017. The species name is to be treated as a noun in genitive case.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
C6B12FD2C57E4B285F432B31F80B79E3.taxon	distribution	Distribution. So far only known from southwestern India (Fig. 11).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
5F32E155187AE727B82545CC3A6F69C2.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. INDIA: 2 females, [no state indicated], 1934 - 394, T. R. Bell leg. (BMNH); West Bengal: 1 female, Calcutta [= Kolkata], 3. x. 1907 (coll. Distant, BMNH); Maharashtra: 1 male, Sindhudurg district, roadside on ridge 2 km W Amboli, 15 ° 58 ' 04 " N, 73 ° 59 ' 23 " E, alt. 2394 ft, pasture and successional, moist deciduous forest, 28. ix. 2005, C. R. Bartlett leg. (UDCC); 1 male, Pune district, 5 km E Mulshi Lake near Tamini village, 18 ° 26 ' 37 " N, 73 ° 25 ' 46 " E, alt. 2047 ft, deciduous forest and open areas, 2. x. 2005, C. R. Bartlett (UDCC); Goa: 2 females, Sanguem district, near Bhagwan Mahaveer Sanctuary 100 m E Molem, 15 ° 22 ' 43 " N, 74 ° 13 ' 52 " E, alt. 342 ft, moist deciduous forest, 24 - 25. ix. 2005, C. R. Bartlett leg. (UDCC); Kerala: 2 males, Malabar, Nadungayam [forest near Nilambur], 200 ft, 16. - 22. ix. 1938 (BMNH); 1 female, Parambikulam, alt. 1700 - 3200 ft, 16. - 24. ix. 1914, F. H. Gravely leg. (coll. Distant, BMNH); 2 females, Tenmalai [= Thenmala], 12. - 15. v. 1937 (BMNH); Tamil Nadu: 1 female, Nilgiri Hills, 11 km SE Kotagiri, Kunchappanai, 11 ° 24 ʹN, 76 ° 56 ʹE, alt. 1100 + / - 100 m, 3. - 15. v. 2002, L. Dembicky leg. (MMBC). SRI LANKA: North Western Province: 1 female, Puttalam district, Puttalam, " 12. " [=? 1912] (coll. Melichar, MMBC); North Central Province: 1 male, Anuradnapura district, Wilpattu National Wildlife Park, Hunuwilagama, Wildlife Soc. Bungalow, 200 ft, 10 - 19. iii. 1970, D. Davis & B. Rowe leg. (USNM); Central Province: 1 female, Kandy district, Talwatte, 29. xi. 1995, M. Schaffer leg. (BMNH); Samaragamuwa: 1 male, Ratnapura district, Uggalkaltota, Irrigation Bungalow, alt. 350 ft, 31. i- 8. ii. 1970, D. Davis & B. Rowe leg. (USNM).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
5F32E155187AE727B82545CC3A6F69C2.taxon	distribution	Distribution. India (southwestern part and West Bengal), Sri Lanka (Fig. 11).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
AD0BAB6D53CF715D92061BD5A14FF9AF.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Orthopagus hainanensis sp. n. is similar to O. lunulifer in most characters, but can be differentiated from the latter by the ivory white to pale ochraceous vertex with a pair of dark brown spots on each side of midline in basal third (in O. lunulifer, the vertex is nearly dark brown from base to apex) and the male segment X being elongate in dorsal view, with ratio of length to width near middle 1.9 - 2.0 (in O. lunulifer, the male segment X is shorter and wider in dorsal view, with ratio of length to width near middle 1.2 - 1.3). Orthopagus hainanensis sp. n. is also similar to O. exoletus in the predominantly light vertex but it differs from the latter by a slightly longer head, the male pygofer with dorso-posterior margin produced into a broad and short lobe in lateral view (the pygofer bears a larger tooth-like process dorso-posteriorly in O. exoletus) and the aedeagus with two pairs of larger (more strongly inflated) dorsolateral membranous lobes and endosomal processes covered with minute spines (indistinct in O. exoletus).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
AD0BAB6D53CF715D92061BD5A14FF9AF.taxon	description	Description. Measurements (5 males, 10 females). Body length (from apex of head to tip of forewings): male 11.7 - 12.9 mm, female 13.1 - 14.6 mm; head length (from apex of cephalic process to base of eyes): male 1.4 - 1.5 mm, female 1.5 - 1.6 mm; head width (including eyes): male 1.6 - 1.7 mm, female 1.6 - 1.7 mm; forewing length: male 9.3 - 10.3 mm, female 10.6 - 11.8 mm. Coloration. General coloration as in generic description (Fig. 2 E-F). Head ivory white to pale ochraceous, vertex with basal corners castaneous, a pair of large fuscous patches on each side of midline at basal third, and pale fuscous apical diamond-shaped spot (Fig. 6 A); frons pale with series of small pale fuscous spots along intermediate and lateral carinae, base without distinct dark spot (Fig. 6 C). Forewing pattern as in Fig. 3 C. Hind wing membrane with a relatively narrow dark brown streak along the apical portion of CuA 1 vein, extending along hind wing apical margin. Structure. Cephalic process (Fig. 6 A-C) relatively elongate. Vertex (Fig. 6 A) with ratio of length at midline to width between eyes 1.65 - 1.75. Transition of vertex to frons narrowly rounded in lateral view (Fig. 6 B). Frons (Fig. 6 C) relatively narrow, with ratio of length at midline to maximum width 2.7 - 2.9. Male genitalia. Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 6 E) with dorso-posterior margin produced into a broad and relatively short blunt lobe; in ventral view (Fig. 6 F) much longer than in dorsal view (Fig. 6 D) with ratio of ventral to dorsal length about 4.2. Gonostyles (Fig. 6 E-F) large, broad medially, with dorsal margin weakly sinuate. Aedeagus (Fig. 6 G-I) with endosomal processes covered with minute spines, extended posteriad and strongly curved dorso-anteriad; phallobase with one pair of large, strongly inflated dorsolateral lobes, their apices gradually convergent and tapering posteriad (Fig. 6 G-I), and one pair of small, thumb-like ventral lobes (Fig. 6 I). Segment X relatively narrow and elongate, in lateral view, narrow basally, widening beyond middle, apex subacute (Fig. 6 E), in dorsal view, widest medially, with ratio of length to width 1.9 - 2.0 (Fig. 6 D). Female genitalia as in generic description (Fig. 7 A-G).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
AD0BAB6D53CF715D92061BD5A14FF9AF.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named for its occurrence in Hainan Island, China. The specific epithet Orthopagus hainanensis is to be treated as a latinized adjective in nominative singular.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
AD0BAB6D53CF715D92061BD5A14FF9AF.taxon	distribution	Distribution. So far only known from Hainan Island, China.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
5F0FF45E15EC86425CAF84B5A2F3ABDD.taxon	materials_examined	Other material examined. JAPAN: Honshu island: 1 female, Tokyo, Matsumura leg. (IZCAS); 1 male, Kamakura, ix. 1913, F. Muir leg. (BPBM); 1 female, Mie prefecture, Matagari lke, 24. x. 1989, C. W. O'Brien & L. B. O'Brien leg. (LBOB). CHINA: Beijing municipality: 1 female, Peiping; 9 males, 15 females, Peiping, 9., 10. and 21. vii. 1938, 4., 13., 15. and 28. viii. 1938, 11., 16., 19., and 24. ix. 1938, T. P. Chang leg.; 1 male, 1 female, Juyongguan, 250 - 280 m, 3. and 6. viii. 1961, S. Y. Wang & X. Z. Zhang leg.; 1 male, 1 female, Zhongguancun, 4. ix. 1962, S. Y. Wang leg.; 3 males, 2 females, Shisanling, 12. ix. 1962, R. Z. Xie leg. (all IZCAS); 2 males, 2 females, Changping, 8. vii. 2007, Z. S. Song leg. (JSSNU); Tianjin municipality: Jixian, 4. ix. 1988, K. H. Zhang leg. (IZCAS); Shandong province: 2 males, 1 female, Tsingtao [Musee Heude]; 1 male, Laoshan, 800 m [Musee Heude] (all IZCAS); Henan province: 1 male, 1 female, Henan, 8. viii. 2013, D. J. Zhang (JSSNU); Anhui province: 2 males, Huang Mountain, 6. viii. 1936 (IZCAS); Shangai municipality: 1 male, 1 female, 27. vii. 1932, O. Piel leg. [Musee Heude] (IZCAS); Zhejiang province: 18 males, 10 females, T'ienmo Shan, 22 - 28. viii. 1936; 2 females, Hangzhou, 24. and 25. viii. 1942; 8 males, 8 females, Chusan, 7., 8., 10., 18., 20., 28. and 29. viii. 1931, O. Piel leg. [Musee Heude] (all IZCAS); 1 ♀, Fujian province: 1 female, Jianyang, Chengguan, 90 - 120 m, 12. viii. 1960, Y. R. Zhang leg.; 1 male, 1 female, Chongan, Xingcun, Sangang, 740 m, 12. and 20. viii. 1960, Y. Zuo & C. L. Ma leg.; 1 male, 2 females, Jiangle, Longqishan, 500 - 700 m, 12., 13. and 19. viii. 1991, S. M. Song leg. (all IZCAS); Hunan province: 1 female, Hoeng-Shan, 900 m, 1933, H. Hoene leg. (MFNB); Guizhou province: 1 female, Libo, 21. viii. 2000, F. M. Shi leg. (IZCAS); Sichuan province: 5 males, 3 females, Emei Mountain, Baoguosi, 550 - 750 m, 7., 9., 10. and 14. ix. 1957, F. X. Zhu & Z. Y. Wang leg. (IZCAS); Tibet (Xizang) autonomous region: 1 female, Chayu, Xiachayu, 1900 m, 21. viii. 2005, Z. S. Song leg. (IZCAS); Guangxi autonomous region: 4 males, 5 females, Guilin, Yanshan, 2., 7. and 23. viii. 1952, 20., 22. and 24. vii. 1953; 2 females, Pingxiang, 12. and 16. vi. 1976, B. L. Zhang leg.; 5 males, 5 females, Nandan, Luofu, 350 m, 27. vii. 2006, J. Liu leg. (all IZCAS); 2 males, 2 females, Guangnan, Bamei, Shiw. Taoyuan, 24 ° 18 ' 51 " N, 105 ° 02 ' 08 " E, 811 m, 12. viii. 2012, D. Redei leg.; 2 males, same but 24 ° 19 ' 08 " N, 105 ° 02 ' 57 " E, 891 m; 1 male 1 female, same but 24 ° 19 ' 11 " N, 105 ° 01 ' 49 " E, 834 m, 13. viii. 2012 (all HNHM); Yunnan province: 1 male, 5 females, Hekou, 80 m, 5. and 7. vi. 1956, K. R. Huang leg.; 3 females, Hekou, Nanxi, 200 m, 8. and 12. vi. 1956, K. R. Huang leg.; 1 male, 1 female, Pingbian, 1400 m, 15. vi. 1956, K. R. Huang leg. (all IZCAS); Taiwan: 1 male, Tainan, Formasa, vi. 1912, H. Sauter, Orthopagus helios Mel. F. Schumacher det. [Schumacher's handwriting] (SDEI); 2 males, 1 female, Taihanroku, vii. and 10. xi, H. Sauter leg. (MFNB); 1 male, 1 female, same data (MZPW); 5 males, 2 females, Taihanroku, 1908, Sauter leg. (HNHM); 1 male, 1 female, Hoozan, 10. vii. and 10. ix., H. Sauter leg. (MFNB); 1 female, Kotobuki, 11. vi. 1935, (IZCAS); 2 females, Tainan county, ca. 350 m, 2 - 3 km S Kwantzuling, bamboo, shrub, 26 - 28. vi. 1980, D. R. Davis leg. (USNM); 1 female, Chi Pen, 10. vi. 1997, B. Herczig & L. Ronkay leg. (HNHM). VIETNAM: 1 female, " Indo China ", R. V. de Salvaza leg. (BMNH); 1 female, Chapa [= Sa Pa], v. - vi. 1916, R. V. de Salvaza leg. (BMNH); 2 males, 1 female, Hoa Binh, vii. 1939, A. de Cooma leg.; 5 males, 2 females Hoa Binh; 1 male, 1 female, Hoa Binh, Thanh-ha district, 12. and 13. vi. 1966, R. Bielawski & B. Pisarski leg.; 2 males, 1 female, Hanoi, 24. vi. 1959, B. Pisarski & J. Proszynski leg.; 4 males, 2 females Ninh Binh, Cuc Phuong, 5., 7. and 8. vi. 1966, R. Bielawski & B. Pisarski leg.; 1 female, Nghe An district, Phu Quy, 17. vi. 1959, B. Pisarski & J. Proszynski leg. (all MZPW); 1 female, Cuc Phuong, 400 m, at light, 17. x. 1986, Vasarhelyi leg. (HNHM). LAOS: 1 male, Borikhane Prov., Pakkading, 31. vii. 1965, native collector leg. (BPBM). INDIA: Assam: 2 males, Chabua, 10. x. 1943, D. E. Hardy leg. (USNM); 1 female, Tocklai, light trap, ix. 1983, 943 / 6, C. I. E. A. 15663 (BMNH). NEPAL: 1 male, Chitwan National Park, Island Jungle reserve, 29 - 30. x. 1995, L. Peregovits leg. (HNHM).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
5F0FF45E15EC86425CAF84B5A2F3ABDD.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Widely distributed in tropical, subtropical and temperate eastern Asia (Japan, China, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, northeastern India and Nepal).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
4C5920DEB5A1B6B1D93DC2B717C24DE3.taxon	materials_examined	Other material examined. PHILIPPINES: Luzon island: 1 male, Mt. Makiling, Baker leg. (USNM); 1 male, Los Banos, 11. xii. 1913, D. T. Fullaway leg. (BPBM); 1 male, Los Banos, i. 1913, P. Ledyard leg (LBOB); 2 males, Mt. Montalban, Rizal, Wa-wa Dam, 150 - 200 m, 6. and 17. iii. 1965, H. M. Torrevillas leg. (BPBM); 1 male, 4 females, Manila, G. Boettcher leg. (MMBC); 1 male, 2 females, " B. M. 1925 - 491 ", E. M. Ledyard leg.; 1 female, " Acc. No. 6625, Lot, Bu. of Sci., P. I., 1908 - 228 ", C. S. Banks leg.; 1 male, " Acc. No. 5364, Lot, Govt. Lab. Coll., 1908 - 228 ", C. S. Banks leg. (all BMNH).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
4C5920DEB5A1B6B1D93DC2B717C24DE3.taxon	distribution	Distribution. So far only known from the Luzon island, Philippines.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
90D6C75134E8650CAAB2E10DB0ADE466.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. CHINA: Hainan island: 1 male, Hainan, 5. v. 1934, C. Ho leg.; 2 females, Shuiman, 640 m, 25. v. 1960, C. Q. Li leg.; 2 males, 5 females, Tongshi, 340 m, 23. and 25. vi. 1960, C. Q. Li leg.; 1 female, Yinggen, 200 m, 6. vii. 1960, S. F. Li leg.; Yunnan province: 1 male, 1 female, Hekou, 80 m, 7. vi. 1956, K. R. Huang leg.; 3 females, Hekou, Xioananxi, 200 m, 8. vi. 1956, K. R. Huang leg.; 1 male, Gaoligong Mountain, 1000 m, 20. viii. 1958, C. L. Li leg.; 1 male, Malipo, 20. vii. 1958; 1 female, Xishuangbanna, Menga, 1050 m, 18. ix. 1957, F. J. Pu leg.; 1 male, 1 female, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 600 m, 9. ix. 1993, H. L. Xu & L. L. Yang leg.; 1 male, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 10. ix. 1993, X. Y. Cheng leg. (all IZCAS). VIETNAM: 1 female, Lao Kay, 31. v. 1960, at light, K. Galewski leg. (MZPW); 1 male, 1 female, Ninh Binh, Cuo-phuong, 5., 7, and 8. vi. 1966, R. Bielawski & B. Pisarski leg. (MZPW); 2 males, 22 km S of Nha Trang, 20 - 26. xi. 1960, C. M. Yoshimoto leg. (BPBM); 1 male, DaiLanh, N of Nha Trang, 30. xi. - 5. xii. 1960, C. M. Yoshimoto leg. (BPBM). THAILAND: Trang province: 1 male, Khaophappha Khaochang, 200 - 400 m, 3. i. 1964, G. A. Samuelson leg. (BPBM). INDIA: Assam: 1 female, Mazbat near Mangaldai, 11 - 15. x. 1910 (coll. Distant, BMNH). MALAYSIA: Penang: 1 male, Island of Penang, Baker leg. (USNM). INDONESIA: Java: 1 male, Java (West), Djasinga, 5. i. 1966, J. Stusak (BPBM); 1 female, Samarang, iv. 1909, E. Jacobson; 1 female, same but vi. 1909 (both coll. Melichar, MMBC); 1 female, Wied. in CW. Java, GW [handwriting] (coll. Zool. Mus. Leipzig Uebernahme 1971, SNSD); 1 male, Java [handwriting] (MFNB).	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
90D6C75134E8650CAAB2E10DB0ADE466.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Confirmed records are from Indonesia (Java), West Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, southern China (Hainan, Yunnnan) and north-eastern India (Assam). Based on the description and illustrations in Yang and Yeh (1994), O. splendens probably also occurs in Taiwan (see also Tsaur 2005). Published records from the Philippines (Luzon; Stal 1861, Distant 1906) probably refer to O. philippinus, while the records from Sri Lanka (Melichar 1903, 1912; Distant 1906) concern O. exoletus and the ones from Japan (Matsumura 1905 a, b, 1910) refer to O. lunulifer. Records from western India (Stal 1861), Myanmar (Distant 1906), Singapore, and Indonesia: Sumatra (Bierman 1908) still need to be checked.	en	Song, Zhi-Shun, Malenovsky, Igor, Chen, Jian-Qin, Deckert, Juergen, Liang, Ai-Ping (2018): Taxonomic review of the planthopper genus Orthopagus (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae), with descriptions of two new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94 (2): 369-391, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.26859
